User talk:H.-P.Haack

31. März 2012

Die großformatigen Zurechtweisungen auf dieser Seite beruhen, was Lizenzen betrifft, auf Unkenntnis der WIKIMEDIA COMMENS-Administratoren. Erst jetzt hat sich unter ihnen herumgesprochen, dass Bildinhalte gemeinfrei seien können, aber nicht die Fotos, die von den Originalen (Objekten) gefertigt wurden.

Viele meiner Fotos sind durch WIKIMEDIA COMMONS-Administratoren zu Treibgut im Netz („gemeinfrei“) deklariert worden. Mein Appell an WIKIMEDIA COMMOMS: Wenn nicht bis 30. April 2012 die widerrechtliche Deklaration „gemeinfrei“ (in dem Sinne, dass ich als Urheber von Objektfotografie nicht genannt werden muss) überall entfernt worden ist, beauftrage ich einen Fachanwalt für Urheberrecht die Löschung sämtlicher Fotos von mir in WIKIMEDIA COMMOMS und in WIKIPEDIA durchzusetzen. Mit einer gerichtlichen Auseinandersetzung riskiere ich nichts. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe lange gewartet. Meine Repros werden als "bar jeglicher b e k a n n t e n Urheberrechte“ deklariert. Ich wende mich jetzt einen Fachanwalt für Urheberechte. Woran ich denke, ist eine kostenpflichtige Abmahnung von WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. H.-P.Haack (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Zur Subjektivität der Fotografie
Fotografien verändern mehr oder weniger das Aussehen des abgebildeten Objekts. Selbst wenn graphische Blätter fotografiert werden. Wie auch der Bildschirm ein Foto leicht verändert, wenn er es präsentiert. Der Urheber eines Fotos muss vom Nutzer genannt werden, da der Fotograf (Amateur oder Profi) für den Wahrheitsgehalt seines Fotos einzustehen hat. Analog dem Autor, wenn es um Text und Erkenntnis geht.
H.-P.Haack 10:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Permission publishing house S. Fischer Frankfurt am Main Germany

File:Permission S. Fischer Verlag Frankfurt am Main Germany.jpg

Permission

Die Zusage der S. Fischer Verlage betrifft Wikipedia, doch kann stillschweigend unterstellt werden, dass sie auch für das Schwesterprojekt Wikimedia Commons gilt, das als Bild-Archiv für Wikipedia genutzt wird.

--H.-P.Haack 19:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 04:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Quertreiberei weckt Kreativität

Projektdefinition

Werke der Gegenwartskunst sind nur zum kleineren Teil in Museen und staatlichen Sammlungen vertreten. Der größere befindet sich in Privatbesitz. Meist bleiben diese Standorte anonym.

Für Ausstellungs-Kuratoren kann es von Bedeutung sein zu wissen, wo sich welches Werk befindet. In der Vergangenheit war ich schon mehrfach Leihgeber für Ausstellungen. Dass die jeweiligen Arbeiten mir gehörten (z. Zt. mir gehören, denn sie werden mich überleben), war den Ausstellungsmachern eher zufällig bekannt. Als Ruheständler habe ich nun Zeit, meine Kunst-Sammlung im Internet zu katalogisieren und will das auch gern tun, gemäß der Forderung: Eigentum verpflichtet. Eine geheime Privatsammlung ist sozial und gesellschaftlich wertlos.

Ältere Werke konnte ich in den Wikimedia-Portalen Commons und Wikipedia publizieren. Bildzitate von zeitgenössischer Kunst werden aber dort abgelehnt bzw. unterdrückt, obwohl sich eine rechtliche Form dafür finden ließe.

In der Vergangenheit hatte ich mit BT Mediawork bereits drei bibliophile Sammlungsverzeichnisse digital publiziert, darunter einen Atlas der Erstausgaben Thomas Manns. Nun folgt nach der gescheiterten Kooperation mit Wikicommons ein viertes virtuelles Sammlungsverzeichnis, diesmal für Kunstfreunde und als Standortnachweis.

Leipzig, Mai 2009

H.-P.Haack (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Hans-Peter Haack

Das Projekt ist in WIKIVERSITY verwirklicht worden. → [1]

Erfolgreich Commons zur Verfügung gestellte Bilder von H.-P.Haack

Fotos, die ich weltweit kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt habe, siehe → [2]. Die weltweite Nutzung meiner Fotos → Google → "h.-p.haack"

Die nachfolgenden Ermahnungen und Löschungen sind entstanden, weil mir lange niemand erklärt hat, dass Bildzitate in Commons nicht erwünscht sind. Ich war immer vom deutschen Urheberrecht inbezug auf → Bildzitate ausgegangen. Die englischen Abmahnungen erreichen mich nicht, da ich keine Fremdsprachen beherrsche. Dessen geniere ich mich nicht, da im Deutschen sich das Wort mir um so mehr zu Gebote hält.

--H.-P.Haack (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:-2- Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Erstdruck .jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:-2- Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Erstdruck .jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 04:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:-1- Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Erstdruck .jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:-1- Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Erstdruck .jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 04:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:353.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:353.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 07:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:354.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:354.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 08:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:157.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:157.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 08:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

STOP!

English - العربية - čeština - Deutsch - dansk - español - français - italiano - 日本語 - Nederlands - polski - português - русский - svenska Please stop uploading unlicensed Images, otherwise you´ll be blocked. __ ABF __ ϑ 08:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Heine S. 351.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:223 Antiquariat.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:223 Antiquariat.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 06:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Schiller Maria Stuart 1801.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Schiller Wallenstein 1800.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Schiller_Wallenstein_1800.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Schiller_Wallenstein_1800.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

abf /talk to me/ 14:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:(6) Flaxman Ilias 1793, gestochen 1795, 186 x 358 mm.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:(6) Flaxman Ilias 1793, gestochen 1795, 186 x 358 mm.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 08:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Category:John Flaxman's Iliad

Hallo, in dieser Kategorie findest Du jetzt Deine hochgeladenen Bilder. Zuvor gab's drei verschiedene (mit unterschiedlichen Schreibweisen). Hoffe, das hilft weiter :-) Grüße --:Bdk: 15:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Sieben Blätter muss ich noch fotografieren und hochladen. Will mir einen Ruck geben, dass ich fertig werde! Grüße -H.-P.Haack 17:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalismus wird nicht geschätzt

---

Bitte lass es sein, Unsinn zu Wikimedia Commons beizutragen. Dies wird als Vandalismus angesehen. Für Tests gibt es die Spielwiese. Danke.

Bitte, nicht das noch einmal machen ! --Pymouss Tchatcher - 16:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Die Erlaubnis der S. Fischer Verlage habe ich zu meiner rechtlichen Absicherung hier publiziert. In den Legenden der Abb. zu meiner Thomas Mann Sammlung verweise ich auf diese Seite hier. → Thomas Mann Sammlung Dr. Haack Leipzig--H.-P.Haack 20:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Boll

Hallo. Bitte entschuldigen Sie meine Sprache, ich bin auf einer Internet-Übersetzer. Ich fürchte, Sie scheinen nicht zu verstehen, Urheberrecht - die Bücher möglicherweise nicht mehr verfügbar sein, aber der ursprüngliche Herausgeber hält Urheberrecht an ihnen für 70 Jahre, und dazu gehört auch das Cover Artwork. Es sei denn, Sie wissen, hält die tatsächlichen Urheberrechte an dem Kunstwerk (wenn die Verlage nicht mehr existieren) und können sicherstellen, dass sie sich in die Public Domain, können wir nicht akzeptieren, solche Bilder auf Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Ich reproduziere aus meinem Internet-Katalog, mit Hinweis auf diese Quelle, mit eigenem Copyrigth für die Bilder. --H.-P.Haack (talk) 11:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hermann Hesse Die Nürnberger Reise 1927.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Hermann Hesse Die Nürnberger Reise 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 10:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Gruß

File:Prince of Persia Sands of Time prince 01.jpg

Ubisoft erlaubt das!

Hallo. Du hast dich also inzwischen auf den Commons angemeldet. Ich habe es durch dein Landarzt-Bild gemerkt. Ist doch auch nicht anders als in de wp. Dann wünsche ich dir noch, dass sich in Zukunft weniger besorgte Bots bei dir melden (ist mir auch schon passiert). Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Jarlhelm (talk) 21:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Gerade sehe ich noch deine Fischer-Erlaubnis. Ich bin beeindruckt. Ich weiß nich, ob du damit bei Wikimedia Erfolg hattest/hast, aber soweit ich weiß, gab es schon ähnliche Dinge, die dann doch nicht gingen, etwa bei der Himmelsscheibe von Nebra. Aber „bei Wikipedia verwenden“ heißt ja, dass jeder alles damit machen darf, alo auch kommerziell, und es ist wohl schwer vorstellbar, dass die Fischer-Umschläge bald für andere Bücher verwendet werden dürfen. Gilt die Erlaubnis nur für Thomas Mann? Etwas ähnliches: Ubisoft hat offenbar die Erlaubnis gegeben, Screenshots ihrer Computerspiele frei zu lizenzieren (siehe Bild rechts). Dafür gibt es auch eine extra Lizenzvorlage. Vielleicht schaffst du das ja auch für alle Umschläge des Fischer-Verlags. :-) --Jarlhelm (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Jahrhelm! Ob ich mit der Fischer-Erlaubnis bei Wikipedia Erfolg hatte? Ja und nein. Mal werden die Fotos geduldet, mal werden sie gelöscht. Warum wie entschieden wird, habe ich noch immer nicht kapiert. Es scheint da Ermessensspielräume zu geben. - Denke, dass, wenn ich aus meinem zvab.com-Antiquariatskatalog abbilde, also aus einer Quelle mit meinem Copyright, keine Einwände bestehen dürften. Scheint für die Administratoren schwer beurteilbar zu sein, da ähnliche Fälle bisher noch nicht vorgekommen sind. Oder doch? - Zu Commons: Mit dem Thomas-Mann-Katalog habe ich erst mal eine Pause eingelegt, da ich damit rechnen muss, dass er von einem Ausländer gelöscht wird, wenn er endlich fertig ist. Stelle die Thomas-Mann-Fotos besser in meinen Antiquariats-Katalog. Da sind sie sicher. Bei Commons lade ich vorerst nur die alten Exemplare hoch (Erscheinungsjahr bis 2007). Gruß --H.-P.Haack (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:1959_Grass_Die_Blechtrommel.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:1959_Grass_Die_Blechtrommel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

82.228.89.180 13:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:1961_Grass_Katz_und_Maus.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:1961_Grass_Katz_und_Maus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

82.228.89.180 13:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Stamm,_Peter_2001.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Stamm,_Peter_2001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

82.228.89.180 13:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sozialistisches_Patienten-Kollektiv_1971.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Sozialistisches_Patienten-Kollektiv_1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

82.228.89.180 13:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Thomas Mann Herr und Hund 1919.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Thomas Mann Herr und Hund 1919.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Mutter Erde (talk) 09:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Ein Glück

Hallo HP, habe gerade o.g. Artikel durchgesehen und mich an Deiner Illustration (Neue Rundschau) erbaut. Danke. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Thomas_Mann_1923.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Thomas_Mann_1923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Thomas_Mann_1923,_Postkartendruck_.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Thomas_Mann_1923,_Postkartendruck_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello H.-P.Haack!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Mühlhausen (Thüringen) um 1650.jpg is uncategorized since 27 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Cicero De amicitia Bibliotheca Palatina.jpg is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Allegorie der Poesie, Mosaik von Raffael.jpg is uncategorized since 17 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Antiquariat Dr. Haack.jpg is uncategorized since 24 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Tolstoi Die Kreutzersonate.jpg is uncategorized since 30 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Rombouts, Gillis 1630 - 1678.jpg is uncategorized since 9 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Leprince 1769.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Goethe Faust Fragment 1790.jpg is uncategorized since 12 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Feuchtersleben, E. von (1845).jpg is uncategorized since 24 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Feuchtersleben 1845.jpg is uncategorized since 25 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Unzer, J. A. 1746.jpg is uncategorized since 25 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Prinzhorn, Hans 1922.jpg is uncategorized since 1 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Kaffebaum Leipzig, Portalrelief.JPG is uncategorized since 20 April 2009.
• Image:Nevelson, Lusie (1899 -1988).JPG is uncategorized since 2 May 2009.
• Image:Otto Piene (1963).JPG is uncategorized since 2 May 2009.
• Image:Heinroth, J. C. A. 1818.JPG is uncategorized since 26 May 2009.
• Image:St. Georg 1804.JPG is uncategorized since 26 May 2009.
• Image:Georgenhaus 1804 mit Park und Teich.JPG is uncategorized since 7 June 2009.
• Image:Georgenhaus 1804 von Süd.JPG is uncategorized since 7 June 2009.
• Image:1841 Ideler Tafel 6.jpg is uncategorized since 20 June 2009.
• Image:-51- Joseph der Ernährer 1943.jpg is uncategorized since 7 August 2009.
• Image:-2.1- Buddenbrooks 1901.JPG is uncategorized since 8 August 2009.
• Image:-16- Thomas Mann Atlas Haack.jpg was uncategorized on 1 September 2009.
• Image:Mann, Thomas Ein Glück (1904).JPG was uncategorized on 9 October 2009.
• Image:Gehäus von H.-P.Haack 13. Nov. 2009.JPG was uncategorized on 13 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Janzarik, Werner (1974).JPG was uncategorized on 24 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Der grüne Heinrich I.JPG was uncategorized on 25 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Einband Normalausgabe.pdf was uncategorized on 12 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Hölderlin, F. (1846).jpg was uncategorized on 26 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Romanushaus in Leipzig.JPG was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Goethe (1802).JPG was uncategorized on 21 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Goethe, J. W. (1802).JPG was uncategorized on 21 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Fontane Effi Briest (1896).jpg was uncategorized on 27 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Der Tod in Venedig Hundertdruck 1912.JPG was uncategorized on 29 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:E.T.A.Hoffmann (1815).JPG was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Voß, J. H. (1781).JPG was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Wieland Oberon 1780.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Heine, H. (1827).JPG was uncategorized on 7 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Hoffmann. E. T. A. (1817).JPG was uncategorized on 24 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:H.-P.Haack Oktober 2011.JPG was uncategorized on 26 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Heinrich Mann Diana (1903).jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Heinrich Mann Minerva (1903).jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Heinrich Mann Venus (1903).jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Thomas Mann Lotte in Weimar (1939).jpg was uncategorized on 24 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Image:Thomas Mann 1955.jpg

Da wird es sehr bald einen Löschantrag zu geben, daher schonmal vorweg eine Erklärung (etwas laienhaft, aber den Regeln entsprechend): Das Photo ist 1955 aufgenommen worden, es unterliegt also auf jedem Fall noch dem Urheberrecht eines Autors (Photographen), dieses könnte entweder nach 70 Jahren erlöschen wenn der Autor auch nach Recherche anonym ist oder für z.B. eine Agentur gearbeitet hat oder 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Photographen - bei 1955 ist beides nicht möglich. Auch wenn der Photograph unbekannt ist gilt dieses, Annahmen wie der Photograph wird sein Recht niemals geltend machen zählen nicht (COM:PRP). Der Photograph (unbekannt) hat sein Einverständnis nicht gegeben, dass Jeder das Bild frei Nutzen kann. Du hast dir die Arbeit mit der Digitalisierung gemacht, die Digitalisierung kannst du auch frei lizensieren, allerdings ist das Bild noch Gegenstand des Urheberrechts des Photographen und damit ist das neue Werk (das digitalisierte Bild) nicht frei lizensierbar, siehe hierzu Commons:Bearbeitungen. Den gleichen Fehler hast du in der Vergangenheit schonmal gemacht, zumindest interpretiere ich es als Fehler. Ich kann natürlich auch falsch liegen: Der Autor könnte sein Einverständnis gegeben haben, dann müsstest du das auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite auch darlegen, sonst ist es für keinen Betrachter nachvollziehbar. Bedenke bitte: Commons (gleiches gilt für Wikipedia) ist ein Archiv für freie Bilder, dass bedeuted: Jeder kann die Bilder im Rahmen bestimmter Lizenzbedingungen nutzen zu jedem Zweck, einschließlich kommerzieller Nutzung. Dazu muss der Urheber/Rechteinhaber eines Werkes sein Einverständniss (in Form einer Lizenz) geben und das Bild selber darf nicht Gegenstand eines fremden Urheberrechtes sein. --Martin H. (talk) 19:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

P.S.: Ich bin noch auf deine Einverständnisserklärung des S.Fischer Verlages aufmerksam geworden: In Ihren Wikipedia-Beiträgen ist leider keine ausreichende Genehmigung, Commons (und auch Wikipedia) aktzeptiert nur Medien die Jeder zu jedem Zweck (einschließlich kommerzieller Nutzung) nutzen kann, auch völlig losgelöst von Wikipedia-Artikeln. Näheres steht auch hier. --Martin H. (talk) 19:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

- ))) - H.-P.Haack (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_1955.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Thomas_Mann_1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

sугсго 20:18, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

File:1956_Grass_Windhühner.jpg

File deletion warning

File:1956_Grass_Windhühner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

sугсго 20:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Arthur_Holitscher.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Arthur_Holitscher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

sугсго 20:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Herr_und_Hund_Gesang_vom_Kindchen_1919.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Thomas_Mann_Herr_und_Hund_Gesang_vom_Kindchen_1919.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

sугсго 20:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

File tagging Image:Thomas Mann Tonio Kröger 1913.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas Mann Tonio Kröger 1913.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Thomas Mann Tonio Kröger 1913.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

ahellwig (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Kann gelöscht werden. --H.-P.Haack (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

File:St. Georg Leipzig um 1913.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Sozialistisches Patienten-Kollektiv 1973.jpg

File:Sozialistisches Patienten-Kollektiv 1973.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Prezbo (talk) 08:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Scans

Hallo H.-P.Haack. Könntest du bitte bei Scans von Büchern, deren Urheberrecht abgelaufen ist, die Angaben so oder ähnlich anpassen? Falls dir der Grund nicht klar sein sollte, kannst du ihn unter de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Nicht schützbare Fotos (Reproduktionen) – 2-D-Regel nachlesen. --Leyo 08:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Es handelt sich bei meinen Bücher-Fotos um keine Scans. Auch nicht um reine Fotos, sondern um aufwendige Bearbeitungen mit Photoshop. Muss wohl zuerst das unbearbeitete Foto hochladen, das dann gemeinfrei wäre und dazu das von mir bearbeitete Foto, für das mir ideelle Urherberrechte zustehen. Billigt mir Commons die Autorenschaft für die bearbeiteten Fotos nicht zu, schmeiße ich den Bettel hin. Habe wegen zwei Schiffsreisen (2 Wochen + 4 Wochen) ohnehin paussiert mit der Foto-Schinderei.--H.-P.Haack (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Die Bücher, die ich für WIKIPEDIA fotografiere, sind Kulturgut und bibliophile Sammlerstücke, die mit den Jahren Individualität erlangt haben. Urheberrechtlich handelt es sich bei meiner Arbeit um Objektfotografie, kein Scannen von Titelblättern. Die Fotos dürfen unentgeltlich von Dritten als Druckvorlagen verwendet werden. Das Recht, dabei als Urheber mit "Foto H.-P.Haack" genannt zu werden, steht mir zu, obwohl es mir einige übelwollende Administratoren von WIKIPEDIA absprechen wollen. Ich sollte auch als Fotograf genannt werden, um das individuelle Buch zu identifizieren (Sammlung H.-P.Haack). Über mein Antiquariat sind viele der abgebildeten Bücher in den Sammlerkreislauf zurückgekehrt.--H.-P.Haack (talk) 09:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Zur Kenntnis: Commons:Forum#Scans von Büchern --Leyo 13:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Buddenbrooks_1904.jpg

File:Thomas_Mann_Buddenbrooks_1904.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 00:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Lotte_in_Weimar_1939_.jpg

File:Thomas_Mann_Lotte_in_Weimar_1939_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 00:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Der_Erwählte_1951.jpg

File:Thomas_Mann_Der_Erwählte_1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 00:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Die_Betrogene_1953.jpg

File:Thomas_Mann_Die_Betrogene_1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 00:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Mann_Die_Betrogene_1953.jpg

File:Thomas_Mann_Die_Betrogene_1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 00:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Kafka_Starke_Verwandlung_1915.jpg

File:Kafka_Starke_Verwandlung_1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 01:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Heinrich_Mann_Die_Armen_1917.jpg

File:Heinrich_Mann_Die_Armen_1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.141.8 01:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:-61.2-_Thomas_Mann_Werkverzeichnis_Haack.jpg

File:-61.2-_Thomas_Mann_Werkverzeichnis_Haack.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.140.221 21:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Goseflasche Pressglas.jpg

Ich wundere mich, was die Ergänzung

«Das Foto darf für wissenschaftliche oder populärwissenschaftliche Publikationen gebührenfrei verwendet werden, sofern der Urheber mit Foto H.-P.Haack vermerkt wird»

bedeuten soll? Die Ergänzung ist falsch. Unter der Lizenz darf das Foto von Jedem, weltweit, für jeden Zweck, wissenschaftliche wie auch kommerzielle Zwecke, jederzeit in jeder Form und in jedem Medium verwendet und verändert werden solange die Lizenz (§4a des Lizenzvertrags) und der Urheber (§4b des Lizenzvertrags) genannt werden. Bitte entferne deine Ergänzung. --Martin H. (talk) 19:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

O. k. -- H.-P.Haack (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

File:St. Georg 1804.JPG

File:St. Georg 1804.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Geschehen. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Nittenau um 1650.jpg

File:Nittenau um 1650.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Mühlhausen (Thüringen) um 1650.jpg

File:Mühlhausen (Thüringen) um 1650.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Leipzig 1804 Peters-Tor.jpg

File:Leipzig 1804 Peters-Tor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Leipzig 1804 Das Hospital St. Georg.jpg

File:Leipzig 1804 Das Hospital St. Georg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Georgenhaus 1804 von Süd.JPG

File:Georgenhaus 1804 von Süd.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 07:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo H.-P.Haack, mit Magnus Manske beschuldigst du wirklich den Falschen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Stimmt. - Sorry. Er zeichnet nicht als Bildgeber, sondern als derjenige, der das Foto von WIKIPEDIA in COMMONBS platziert hat. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Wären wir hier in der de-WP, so hättest du für diese Drohung eine Sperre kassiert. Bitte verzichte in Zukunft aus sowas. Bei Magnus entschuldigt hast du dich ja gerade eben. --Leyo 08:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Abgesehen von davon würde ich dich im eigenen Interesse bitte, derartige rechtliche Drohungen gegen andere User generell zu unterlassen, weil sie auch deiner Sache nicht dienen. Es ist zwar herrschende (und hier verständlicherweise favorisierte) Meinung, dass Reproduktionen gemeinfreier Werke ebenfalls gemeinfrei sind, aber es ist ja durchaus nicht ausgeschlossen, dass deine Argumentation aufgrund deiner speziellen "Reproduktionsmethode" dennoch rechtlich gültig/zutreffend ist. Die Bereitschaft, dies zu klären bzw. ggf. klären zu lassen (jurist. Gutachten), dürfte auch von deinem Auftreten beeinflusst werden. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Das fotografierte Objekt ist aufgrund seines Alters gemeinfrei, aber nicht das Foto. Meine Buchfotografien werden als Objektfotografie anerkannt. Wenigstens das. Die Fotographie von alten graphischen Blättern - mehr Handwerk als Kunst - ist ebenfalls Objektfotografie. Ich wäre nicht eingeschnappt, wenn alle fotografierten Bilder ("zweidimensional") von mir gelöscht würden. Wenn Commons die Bilder behalten will, dann aber nur, wenn die Fotos als Objektfotografie eingestuft werden und ich genannt werde. Vorschlag: "Foto Wikimdeia commons H.-P.Haack" oder noch besser: "Foto Wikimedia H.-P.Haack". Da meine Fotos alle als Druckvorlagen geeignet sind, würde diese Urheberbezeichnung auch der Meinung über Wikipedia in der Öffentlichkeit zugute kommen, wenn in einem Sachbuch die Bildprovenienz mit Wikipedia vermerkt werden muss. Man wird kaum einen anderen Sammler finden, der Fotos seiner Raritäten der Öffentlichkeit kostenlos übergibt. Wenn er das macht, sollte man ihm gönnen, dass er als Fotograf genannt wird. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 10:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Mein Anwalt David Nourney, Kanzlei Knigge Nourney Böhm, Leipzig, macht in einem Schriftsatz gegen eine Raubkopie durch den Leipziger Universitätsverlag geltend: "Die von unserem Mandanten erstellten Fotos sind geschützte Werke i.S.v. §§ 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 5 UrhG." "Durch die Übernahme der streitgegenständlichen Fotografien ohne Genehmigung unseres Mandanten und ohne Vermerkung seiner Urheberschaft haben Sie die ihm zustehenden Rechte nach den §§ 13, 16 und 17 UrhG verletzt."

Wow. Falls es wirklich zu einer Verhandlung mit Gerichtsspruch kommt, wäre das Ergebnis auch für "uns" interessant. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Es wird zu keiner Verhandlung kommen. Der Anwalt fordert vom Verlag seine Gebühren, da der im Unrecht ist (1.600 €). Wenn er den Anwalt bezahlt, dann bestätigt er damit diese Rechtslage. Das Buch ist gedruckt und ausgeliefert, da ist nichts mehr zu machen. - Mir reicht der Schuss vor den Bug, beim Verlag und beim Autor, die ich persönlich beide kenne und die mich kennen. Ich kann das Scheiben vom Anwalt scannen und hochladen. Da hätte Commons ewas Schriftliches zu dieser Rechtsfrage anhand eines Beispiels. Muss aber noch seine Einwilligung einholen. Wenn er bockt, wäre ich bereit, eine schriftliche Rechtsauskunft von ihm für Commons zu bezahlen und hochzuladen. Der Anwalt wäre dann haftbar, wenn aufgrund seiner Rechtsauskunft Commons in Schwierigkeiten kommen sollte. - Ach was, ich spendiere für Commons diese schriftliche Rechtsauskunft von einem Fachanwalt für Urheberrechtsfragen. Gib mir Bescheid, ob Du und andere Admins. zustimmen wollen und akzeptieren. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hoffe, dass der Mann keine astronomische Summe fordert. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, auch wenn ich kein Jurist bin: wenn die Gegenseite darauf eingeht, dann bestätigt das nicht notwendigerweise wirklich die Rechtslage, sondern kann lediglich ein Indiz sein, dass der gegn. Anwalt deinen Anspruch für immerhin nicht unmöglich hält. Es kann aber auch einfach sein, dass man die sicher höheren Kosten eines Sachverständigenprozesses vermeiden will. Dein Angebot ist nett gemeint, aber da wäre ich etwas vorsichtig, denn das kann, wenn es wirklich solide sein soll, doch recht teuer sein. Außerdem meine ich, dass das eher Aufgabe von Wikimedia-de wäre, so etwas zu bezahlen. Wir können aber gerne mal einige juristisch versierte de-Commons-Benutzer ohne Sendungbewußtsein, wie z.B. Pill und H-stt, hinzuziehen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich werde vom Verlag ein Errate-Blatt fordern, das in die noch nicht verkauften Bücher eingelegt werden muss. Öffnen der Folie, Erratablatt einlegen, neue Folie schweißen. Das macht einige Mühe.Dr. Diesener, der Verlagsleiter, wird das nur machen, wenn er das muss. Und ich bin berechtigt, das zu fordern. Wer die Bilder vertauscht hat, Autor, Sekträterin, Buchgestalterin des Verlags, wird man wohl nie eindeutig klären können. Haftbar bleibt der, der das Buch hergestellt hat. Der könnte nun wieder still und leise sich mit dem Autor einigen, dass der mit seiner Haftpflichtversicherung für den Schaden des Verlags aufkommt. Wenn sie denn den Schaden anerkennt. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:H.-P.Haack 2011.jpg

Da in der Beschreibungsseite "Z. Yushaev" als Autor/Mitautor genannt wird, muss dieser der Freigabe/Lizenz auch zustimmen. Bitte um Nachreichung der Erlaubnis. Danke. --LutzBruno (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Heinrich Mann Minerva (1903).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Mann Minerva (1903).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Heinrich Mann Minerva (1903).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Quedel (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Heinrich Mann Diana (1903).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Heinrich Mann Diana (1903).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Heinrich Mann Diana (1903).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Quedel (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

---

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Wenn ich als Bildgeber genannt werde - das werde ich ja nun - ziehe ich meinen Löschungsantrag zurück. Aber o. k., ich lösche nicht mehr.

- - H.-P.Haack (talk) 07:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

File:H.-P.Haack 2011.jpg

File:H.-P.Haack 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LutzBruno (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Auch auf Commons gibt es Regeln.

Eine Regel ist, dass Namensnennungen und Huldingungen in Bid-Annotationen nichts zu suchen haben. Commons:Bildvermerke. Vielen Dank fürs beachten.

Wenn ich schon die Chance habe dir etwas mitzuteilen: Der Eintrag #Permission publishing house S. Fischer Frankfurt am Main Germany den du auf deiner Diskussionseite ganz oben bewirbst ist keine Freigabe die für Wikimedia Commons gilt. Wikimedia Commons ist - genau wie die anderen Projekte - ein Projekt für freie Inhalte. Eine Freigabe zur "Abbildung [..] in [...] Wikipedia-Beiträgen" ist für die Projekte völlig wertlos da es mit freien Inhalten nichts zu tun hat.

--Martin H. (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Das Schreiben vom Fischerverlag ist schon älter. Damals ging es darum, ob ich überhaupt die Bücher in Wikimedia abbilden darf. Inzwischen wird das nicht mehr infrage gestellt. Die Hinweise auf das Schreiben vom Fischerverlag lösche ich. Fange wieder von vorn an. - Jezt ist es in Wikimedia endlich gestattet, als Bildgeber sich nennen zu lassen. Ein Recht, dass jedem, der eine Fotoarbeit erstellt, zusteht. Darum musste ich seit 2007 kämpfen. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Wenn Du Linkvemerke zu dem Schreiben vom Fischerverlag findest, lösche sie bitte. Ich habe inzwischen zwei gefunden und entfernt. Es wird dauern, bis ich alle diese Hinweise gefunden habe, die mir als Rechtfertigung gedient haben. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 09:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich wiederhole nochmal: Die Bildvermerke sind nicht in der Weise zu nutzen wie du es gerade tust. Commons:Bildvermerke#Beispiele unpassender oder nicht-informativer Bildnotizen. --Martin H. (talk) 10:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich hoffe, dass Du eine Einzelmeinung vertrittst. Wenn mir Commons nicht gestattet, als Foto-Urheber genannt zu werden, klage ich die Löschung sämtlicher Bilder von mir in Wikimedia ein. Zur Zeit gehe ich anwaltlich gegen einen Leipziger Medizinprofessor vor, der zwei Bilder von mir in seinem Buch veröffentlicht hat und als Quelle das Stadtgeschichtliche Museum Leipzig angibt. Der Auftrag ist für RA Nourney, Fachanwalt für Urheberrecht, Kanzlei Knigge, Nourney, Böhm Leipzig, eine Kleinigkeit. Eine Klage wegen hunderten von Bildern wäre für ihn lohnender. Also stimm Die mit anderen Admins ab: Entweder ihr schmeißt mich mit a l l e n meinen Fotos raus oder ihr behaltet mich als namentlich genannten Foto-Urheber. Beides hat für mich seine Vor- und Nachteile, vielleicht ist der Bruch mit Wikimedia die bessere Lösung für mich. ABER OHNE ENTEIGNUNG! MIT RÜCKERSTATTUNG DIESER SELTENEN ORIGINAL-FOTOS VON MIR! - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 11:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Du wirst auf Wikimedia Commons als Urheber genannt. In der Bildbeschreibung. Aber nicht als Image annotation (bzw. Bildvermerk), deine letzten Bearbeitungen sind ausschließlich missbräuchliche Verwendungen der Funktion "Notiz hinzufügen". --Martin H. (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Ich hab's kapiert! Entschuldige bitte. Dass ich mich geirrt habe, ist dämlich, aber ich bin auch wieder froh, dass mein Alarm falsch war. Die Lizenzvermerke entferne ich wieder. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Viele meiner Fotos sind durch WIKIMEDIA COMMONS-Administratoren zu Treibgut im Netz („gemeinfrei“) deklariert worden. Mein Appell an WIKIMEDIA COMMOMS: Wenn nicht bis 30. April 2012 die widerrechtliche Deklaration „gemeinfrei“ (in dem Sinne, dass ich als Urheber von Objektfotografie nicht genannt werden muss) überall entfernt worden ist, beauftrage ich einen Fachanwalt für Urheberrecht die Löschung sämtlicher Fotos von mir in WIKIMEDIA COMMOMS und in WIKIPEDIA durchzusetzen. Mit einer gerichtlichen Auseinandersetzung riskiere ich nichts.

Der Anwalt wird eine erneute Frist sezten. Das Schreiben des Anwalts ist bereits gebührenpflichtig für den, der im Unrecht ist. Die Anwaltsgebühr richtet sich nach dem Streitwert. Den legt der Anwalt nach Ermessen fest. Im Zweifelsfall wird der Streitwert vom Gericht ermittelt. - - H.-P.Haack (talk) 06:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Einmisch: Ich finde es bemerkenswert, mit welchem Eifer Du hier für Qualitativ gute bis mittelmäßige Fotos streitest, die Werke von anderen Künstlern zeigen, und dabei darauf beharrst, unbedingt mit genannt zu werden... Die Regeln hier sollte man eigentlich begreifen BEVOR man irgend was hochläd... Nachdem was Du hier über Deine Person veröffentlicht hast, kann ich mir eigentlich nicht vorstellen, das du das noch nötig hättest, aber ist Deine Entscheidung. Nur Schade das hier immer mehr Menschen, die ehrenamtlich dieses Projekt am laufen halten, Zeit und Nerven investieren müssen, um Deine Forderungen zu bearbeiten. Mal abgesehen davon, ob du hier juristisch im Recht bist oder nicht (Anwälte suchen immer den Konflikt auch wenn sie es besser wissen, das ist nun mal ihr Job), moralisch wirst du dir hier ein zweifelhaftes Denkmal setzen, was wohl eher mit deiner Person verbunden werden wird... Deine Drohungen machen Dich da nicht sympatischer... ;-) Aber tue, was Du tun must... Und sorry, aber das mußte ich mal hier loswerden! Grüße --LutzBruno (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Lieber H.-P.Haack,

ich habe mir Deine Diskussionsseite, Deine Löschanträge und viele Deiner weiteren Beiträge durchgelesen, und glaube verstehen zu können, worum es Dir geht. Zunächst einmal vielen Dank für Deine Arbeit und Mühen. Du möchtest auf den von Dir erstellten Fotografien als Erstellern genannt werden, was ich völlig verstehen kann, doch ist es eben nicht geltendes Recht. Auch ein Einsortierer (Kategorisierer) oder ein Übersetzer in eine andere Sprache könnte dieses Recht dann ebenso einfordern. Die Fotografien würden bald überborden von Rechte-Inhabern. Als Fotograf ist es Dein gutes Recht, genannt zu werden. Das erfolgt hier bisher in der Historie der Dateien. Falls Du mehr möchtest, ist es ebenso Dein gutes Recht, dieses einzuklagen. Bis Du ein gültiges Urteil vorweisen kannst, werde ich aufgrund meiner Administratorenrechte ein Behalten Deiner Fotografien erwirken. Wenn Du ein rechtsgültiges Urteil vorweisen kannst, werden die Dateien eben gelöscht. Und vermutlich in naher Zukunft durch einen anderen Fotografen/Hochlader, der nicht auf diese Rechte besteht, ersetzt. Dann wäre Deine bisherige Arbeit völlig umsonst, und vermutlich auch nicht in Deinem Sinn. Liebe Grüße --Hystrix (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo H.-P. Haack, warte doch mit weiteren Löschanträgen usw. ab, bis die anliegende Sache zu File:Georgenhaus 1804 von Süd.JPG (s.o.) geklärt ist und man daraus event. Schlußfolgerungen bzgl. der Urheberschaft ziehen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:1944 Thomas Mann Das Gesetz.jpg

File:1944 Thomas Mann Das Gesetz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kafka Das Schloss 1926.jpg

File:Kafka Das Schloss 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:43, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Johannespassion

Hallo H.-P.Haack,
als feedback: ich finde diese Änderung wirklich keine Verbesserung. Rahmen entfernt - d'accord! Aber jetzt ist das Bild ganz unnatürlich grell leuchtend orangegelb geworden. Für ein historisches Dokument nicht angemessen und auch optisch unschön, vergleiche es mal mit diesem Bachschen Autograph. So wie jetzt sieht es im Original in der Staatsbibliothek garantiert nicht aus. Grüße --Furfur (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:September 2007.JPG

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Krafft-Ebing.jpg

File:Krafft-Ebing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)