User talk:Crisco 1492
|
01 · 02 · 03 · 04 · 05 · 06 · 07 · 08 · 09 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43 · 44 · 45 · 46 · 47 · 48 · 49 · 50 |
Contents
- 1 Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM
- 2 Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM
- 3 Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II
- 4 Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II
- 5 Quality Image Promotion
- 6 File:William Smith, Walter K. Kolomoku - Aloha Oe.ogg
- 7 FP Promotion
- 8 Quality Image Promotion
- 9 Quality Image Promotion
- 10 File:Barry Docks pano.jpg
- 11 PTOD
- 12 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meisje met de parel.jpg
- 13 permission to use photo
- 14 File:Voice of Fire photo.jpg
- 15 Valued Image Promotion
Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM[edit]
 |
Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
grendel|khan 22:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM[edit]
|
Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
grendel|khan 22:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II[edit]
|
Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
grendel|khan 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II[edit]
|
Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
grendel|khan 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! Es Ampiang Dadiah, Pasar Ateh, Bukittinggi, 2017-02-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Padang City as seen from the peak of Gunung Padang, 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Horizon from Gunung Padang, Padang, 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Seberang Pebayan Village, Padang 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Batu Malin Kundang, Air Manis Beach, Padang 2017-02-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
File:William Smith, Walter K. Kolomoku - Aloha Oe.ogg[edit]
Can you possibly delete my edits and uploads from File:William Smith, Walter K. Kolomoku - Aloha Oe.ogg? They were all test edits.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- KAVEBEAR, I'm not an admin on Commons. Sorry. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
The image File:Crown of the Virgin of the Immaculate Conception, known as the Crown of the Andes MET DP365520.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crown of the Virgin of the Immaculate Conception, known as the Crown of the Andes MET DP365520.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
 |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! Boats on Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Support Good quality.--
 |
Congratulations! Nusa Larang Island, Situ Lengkong 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Boats on Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Dead tree at Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Entrance to the grave of Prabu Harian Kancana, Situ Lengkong 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! Rice fields in Ungaran, Semarang 2017-03-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Billowing clouds over Ungaran, 2017-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Pulau Pisang Ketek, Padang 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! Ngarai Sianok, Bukittinggi, 2017-02-12 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Barry Docks pano.jpg[edit]
 |
File:Barry Docks pano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
PTOD[edit]
No more notices for PTOD on EN? --Don (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nothing ATM, but I've been out of town for three days. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- I noticed a pic I did as PTOD on Mar 31, and no one ever bothered to mention it to me. Thought that was a bit odd..--Don (talk) 11:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think you got notifications the last few times, either. I stopped leaving notifications on blocked users' talk pages after being asked to do so a few years back. (I think 2014). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- I noticed a pic I did as PTOD on Mar 31, and no one ever bothered to mention it to me. Thought that was a bit odd..--Don (talk) 11:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
-
-
- Not true at all, I would always receive notice. Review your FB chat for the history of my requests regarding the last few, In the future please provide such on the site that the photos were uploaded to, commons - ty. --Don (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- The last POTD notification you got was in 2014. As I said, I stopped leaving notifications on blocked users talk pages after I was asked to do so in 2014. The recent ones (4 July 2016, and two in the last couple of months) had no such notification.
- If you're asking a favor, it usually works better when you don't accuse the person you're asking of being a liar first. As things stand, I really have no interest in cross-posting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not true at all, I would always receive notice. Review your FB chat for the history of my requests regarding the last few, In the future please provide such on the site that the photos were uploaded to, commons - ty. --Don (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
-
I was not asking for anything nor did I assert that you lied, I am sorry that you took it that way, not what I had intended. The notice came cross platform via a ping when you used my ID in the notice. After review I noticed that I received the "ping" notice and was looking for nothing more, that same notice. Please, have a nice day...--Don (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meisje met de parel.jpg[edit]
See my comments at the FP. -- Colin (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Am commenting now. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
permission to use photo[edit]
Hello,
Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, “File:Crijn Hendricksz.jpeg” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.
With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 01:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- That is not my photograph. It is a public domain scan of a painting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Voice of Fire photo.jpg[edit]
|
File:Voice of Fire photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
— Racconish ☎ 11:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
%2c_processed%2c_obverse%2breverse.jpg/75px-50000_rupiah_bill%2c_2016_series_(2016_date)%2c_processed%2c_obverse%2breverse.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'50000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2016 series'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
