User talk:Teofilo

• Archives :
• december 2005 to December 2007

• september 2008 to 23 April 2009

• 24 April 2009 to 4 May 2012

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Raoli

Now these files are used in a it.wikiquote's page. This procedure can now end? raul (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Gérard Majax

Ce n'est pas que cette photo soit exceptionnelle, mais cette proposition de suppression me semble être un excès de pinaillage... JJ Georges (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Petite précision, je n'en fais pas un drame (même si je préfèrerais évidemment qu'elle soit conservée), je trouve juste dommage de couper ainsi les cheveux en quatre. D'autant qu'en son temps la question avait été abordée par Bapti avec le photographe. JJ Georges (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:View from the Eiffel Tower's Second Level.jpg

And also:

• File:Quartier de la Muette.jpg

Yours sincerely, Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sangam worldcup stadium 2005.jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 08:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

map gallica tribes

Hi Teo, you wrote here about the picture. I find the picture strange because of the computer/scan-made, its absolute not a usual standard of geographical maps. I guess its home-made and for sure there are to much vague information about it. is there already an alternativ? regards from turicum--93.184.26.78 10:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Bienvenue

Commons:Bienvenue has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Baronfuzz (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Animals_in_zoos_by_zoo_name

Category:Animals_in_zoos_by_zoo_name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

darkweasel94 19:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:Catscan gallery

Template:Catscan gallery has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    19:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Help:Nominate for deletion

Help:Nominate for deletion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4bangoai (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Help:Nominate for deletion

Help:Nominate for deletion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4bangoai (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Help:Nominate for deletion

Help:Nominate for deletion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guiggz (talk) 08:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Help:Nominate for deletion

Help:Nominate for deletion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Subrata shuvro (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Pauquet

Bonjour ! Pourriez-vous faire un article sur les graveurs Pauquet sur le wikipedia fr ? Bien à vous et d'avance merci. --Spiessens (talk) 06:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:River_sources

Category:River_sources has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

W like wiki (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Canis_lupus_subspecies

Category:Canis_lupus_subspecies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 07:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Teofilo, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)