User talk:Túrelio/Archive10

Talkpage archive from 2015

Thanks

Hi Túrelio, I mistakenly removed the template here, I thought i were removing the copyvio template. Thanks for your edit. And the contest is closed anyway. Regards and Happy new year :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Happy new year. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

For File:フルブル - マンボウ.jpg

Hello. But is sffenly talk. I don't write the English onry a little becoase it's Japanese,It mighet be wrong,it may have misttaen,it may be a lot of rude and more. Thank you...

Well,I'll move on to the main topic. When I mentined the

a while ago stretched 「{{Autotranslate|1=File:フルブル - マンボウ.jpg|base=Copyvionote}} [[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)」 .

But,This Sunfish's is what took. And I have it and image procrssing. So,Shoule have a right me.

This is the limit in the translator. I wanted to say more. It would be hard to ryad,but sorry.おしえてくださりありがとうございました。べんきょうになります。--フルブル (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi フルブル, I do not really understand what you are saying, but I have asked my ja-speaking colleague Whym for help. --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

フルブルさん宛：Twitterプロフィールの画像をこちらでもお使いになりたい場合、ご自分のTwitterプロフィールか新しいツイートで「私の Wikimedia Commons のアカウント名はフルブルです。プロフィール画像はCC BY-SA 4.0でリリースします」等の宣言してください。確認がとれるまでは第三者が盗用しているのと区別がつかないので、念の為削除しておくことになっています。なおこれが可能なのは自作画像の場合です。一部であっても自作でない素材が入っていると、ウィキメディア・コモンズでは使えないことがあります。 --whym (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Commentwhymさん宛:この画像は元々私が撮ったマンボウをトリミングしたものであり、それをスマートフォンのアプリケーションを使用し文字表示させたものですので、アプリケーションの規約を見た上でもその文字には権利がアプリケーションの作成側に渡るといったことは無いようですので、一切私以外の第三者が有する権利はありません。なお、宣言ツイートはここにあります→ID：@jetm1005 - http://www.twitter.com/jetm1005/stuts/551223909425479680?s=09/ フルブル (talk) 03:57, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

フルブルさん宛： ありがとうございます。削除をとりけしました。ただ、利用者ページでしか使用の見込みがなさそうな画像ですので、そこでも使用されない場合また削除の対象になる可能性がありますのでご承知おきください。 I think the identity as the author and explicit license has been confirmed by a Twitter post [1], and I restored it. As a user profile picture I think it's acceptable regarding COM:SCOPE as well. (@Krd: FYI, because you deleted it.) whym (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Commentwhym了解しました。こちらこそご理解いただき感謝します。--フルブル (talk) 12:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Whym. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Just as an FYI, based on this conversation and the Twitter post I just 'passed' this for license review. Not that it's an issue, just thought I'd mention it for the sake of any later discussion that comes up. Revent (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Página borrada

Buendía, realmente no sé porqué es que me borran la página que subo. Hace varios días que intento y me es imposible. espero una respuesta. gracias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karina E. Rabolini (talk • contribs)

Hi Karina E. Rabolini,

perdon, pero no sabe sufficiente espanol para communicar. I hope you understand english. The reason why I have deleted the version of your userpage User:Karina E. Rabolini from December 23rd, was that it read like a biography. However, userpages on Wikimedia projects are not like Facebook oder personally-owned websites, but instead should provide only information that is relevant for other users of this project. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Szoszana Rabinowicz. Przeżyłam dzięki mojej matce 2012 MZW.jpg

Witam, niestety niczego nie zrozumiałem, co było do przewidzenia, na to bowiem wskazuje moja wieża Babel użytkownika. Mogę się jedynie domyślać, że chodzi o ten pojedynczy plik. Ale jest Pan w gorącej wodzie kąpany, należało parę godzin poczekać, byłem w trakcie realizacji całego cyklu ilustracji i oto już są w commons. Pozdrawiam serdecznie życząc pomyślności w Nowym Roku i w działaniach w wikiprojektach z commons włącznie. M Z Wojalski (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, but I do understand what you are saying, even not with the help of Google-translation. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Richmond (London) Station Remake

Hi Túrelio,

I heard that you have recently deleted the wikimedia commons category Richmond (London) station due to confusion. It might take some time to make a new page for it but can we remake the page together please. It will help a lot.

Thank you.Vincent60030 (talk) 08:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Vincent60030,

do you have the exact name of the deleted category? I don't remember it and I didn't find it among by recent 1,000 deletions. Having the exact name, would allow to undelete it and restore the original content. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

florida panther

I would like to know more about the copyright and such of the sculpture, and why is it going to be deleted.

A bus stop in orlando has that sculpture, I thought it was interesting, so I took the picture of the bus stop.

The bus stop is located in International drive in Orlando, in front of the convention center. Please let me know what's the problem with it, so that I know for future occasions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miosotis jade (talk • contribs)

Hi Miosotis jade,

sure, the sculpture is impressive and I would have enjoyed to have stood in front of it (as I like cats). However, it surely is a creative work and is too new to be out of copyright. As I had mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Florida panther.JPG, in the U.S. there is freedom-of-panorama exception for public works only for mere buildings, not for other works of art (see Commons:Freedom of panorama). That is the reason why this photo had to be requested for deletion. Of course, if you know the artist, you may contact him/her and try to obtain a permission for your photo. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

rendering of the apostle Paul

Hi, I am trying to find out if I need permission to use thee rendering of the apostle Paul in the Bible I am doing. If I need to put info on who produced it, what am I to say?

Thanks, Ted D. Cherry tedcherry@msn.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.49.167.47 (talk • contribs)

Hi Ted,

I assume you are refering to File:PaulusTarsus LKANRW.jpg. You do not need any individual permission. As this image is under a CC-BY-SA license, all you need to do is to credit the author, LKA NRW (which is the abbrevation for w:Landeskriminalamt NRW), and to mention (CC-BY-SA) or link to the license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/de/deed.en). Of course, this facial composite was not created by the whole State Criminal Police Office, but by an individual profiler. However, when I obtained their license, they asked that the office is credited, instead of an individual person. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MotherTeresa_094.jpg

Thank you for sharing the image. I plan to use it in a corporate presentation on relationships - as an example of "the power of one person". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.159.221 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jaffna Post Office.JPG

can't you see clearly the image description in this picture?? i captured this picture from my iphone6? please look more details before you suggest things in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eeriyaka (talk • contribs)

@Eeriyaka, next time before wrongly accusing another user, first read (the above linked deletion-discussion) and try to understand what happened. Your image had been requested for speedy-deletion by somebody else. I contested this request and converted it into a regular (slow) deletion-request, which gives more time for input from other users (Why didn't you comment in that discussion?). After 2 weeks the closing admin deleted the image per the rationale that your photo depicted a building that is likely still under copyright by its architect/designer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Dan Pero Manescu

Hello, as you did notice Q-ART (Quantum-Art) is me Dan Pero Manescu. I have to introduce a picture of Rosa Maria Paz for the German Wikipedia, but I have problems with the licens. Rosa Maria Paz did buy the pictures from the photographers for her webs, and she is free to show the pictures every where, but i have no idea how to do now with the commons. Best Q-ART Wenn Du mir helfen kannst das Foto von Paz richtig zu krigen das wäre schon fantastisch! Besten Grüße -Q-ART

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank, ich habe weiter Rosa alles erklärt, ich weiss es nicht wie schnell wird sie reagiert, sie ist jetzt viel unterwegs mit dem Tourné Theater. Besten Grüßen , Dan

It's me Russavia

Hi Túrelio, thanks for your concern and diligence in protecting my identity on my talk page. However, the IP was me. I made the text available on Pastebin and very much ok with this being made available for all and sundry to see. I will also email you to confirm that both that, and this, is me. Thanks and good luck. 85.234.141.185 01:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Russavia,

after seeing the post on Philippe's talkpage, I understand your rationale. Regrettably I can no longer unhide the 2 IP-edits on your talkpage as they have been oversighted. However, the link has been pasted in the COM:AN thread anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ZugspitzbahnVorAlpspitzbahntalstation_9895.jpg

Hallo Turelio,

Dieses Bild ist auch in der Kategorie BOB - Berner Oberland Bahn, Schweiz, einsortiert.

Warum?

--Bahnhofbilder (talk)

Keine Ahnung. Das solltest du den Kollegen Gürbetaler fragen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Restoring of file File:Prabodha Tarangalul.pdf

Dear Túrelio, The book follows same OTRS as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gutta.pdf. Thank you--రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi రహ్మానుద్దీన్,

I have restored the file. However, you need to get an OTRS volunteer to check and add the ticket number. --Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you! --రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 13:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Retirement

I was looking at the category of retired commons users, and I realized that you have added some users to that category after their deaths. This is not at all what "retired" means; the word implies that they have consciously decided to stop contributing to Commons.

I would remove it myself, but you have protected those pages. DS (talk) 19:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi DS, the page-protection is standard practise for such cases, so that's not an issue. On Commons we are usually not that strict with words. When I was in search for a fitting category to categorize deceased users 4 years ago, I found only the "retired user" cat. As you may known, even on the oldest and most developed project, the cat "Deceased Wikipedians" is just 1 month old. So, we might either open a discussion/rfC about whether to create this new cat on Commons or just do it and wait what happens. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Marina Yakhlakova.jpg

Dear Túrelio, RE: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marina_Yakhlakova.jpg You deleted an image claiming that it violated copyright when in fact it does not. It is an editorial photo that I own and posted for editorial and encyclopedic purposes.

I took this image, own the original and posted it on wikicommons.

However, you have incorrectly claimed that somebody else owns the copyright when I in fact own it and posted it.

The website that you source as the copyright owner makes specific reference to which photos are copyrighted requiring a photo credit.

The photo I uploaded is not one of them. SteinwayO — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteinwayO (talk • contribs)

Hi SteinwayO,

just for general information: every recent photography is copyrighted automatically. Of course, the photographer or rights holder may choose to release a work into the public domain or under a free license.

Per your statement I am still wondering, did you really shoot this photo? If yes, then why is it shown at marinayakhlakova.com without mentioning your authorship?

--Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

About the deletion of the files

Hello! Some of the files I've uploaded were deleted. These files are part of a work with the collaboration of the Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation so I have their permission to upload them. What actions should I do to prove it? Thanks. Postscriptum123 (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Postscriptum123,

if you are on good terms with them, you may try to get a permission, provided they are indeed the author of the photos. If the latter is true and assuming that the depicted clothing itself is no longer under copyright, such a permission would be possible. See Commons:Permission for details.

What is important to know: our policy requires that uploads are free for creating derivatives of the original image and for any kind of use, including commercial use. As an example: a third party would be allowed to print such an image onto a postcard and sell the card, provided they stick to the license terms. If the Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation is willing to grant such a permission, you shold prepare a permission, using the template at Commons:OTRS#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries. All images need to be mentioned in the permission, though you do not need a separate permission for each image. When it is ready, you should send the permission to them, ask them to read it, sign and date it and mail it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Files uploaded from Flickr

Hello, as you can see on the Talkpage of Jianjui67 (User talk:Jianhui67), i was actually asking to EEAS if they can change their licence (at least on the two images i've uploaded). --Masterdeis (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Masterdeis, no problem. The moment you get a positive signal from them, drop me a note and I will restore them temporarily until their permission is validated by our OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Françoise-Marie de Bourbon as Amphitrite by Rosalba Carriera (1701-1723).jpg

Hallo Túrelio, wahrscheinlich musste es bei obiger Datei schnell gehen, kannst Du auch noch die vorletzte Dateiversion löschen? Danke. --Ras67 (talk) 01:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Nee, einfach übersehen, dass es hier mehrere Versionen gab. Danke für den Hinweis.  Done --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Andrew W. Bing the original Translator in my family tree

1611-1961-2005 I am aware of certain things and dates...pam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.197.223.157 (talk • contribs)

Hi 69.197.223.157,

I have no idea to what issue, user or file you are relating. --Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Sehe keinen Fehler

Hallo Túrelio, schau bitte was ida falsch sein soll. File:Bingen am Rhein, Mäuseturm.jpg Danke Dir....--HOWI (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo HOWI, du hast lediglich vergessen, den Lizenzbaustein einzufügen. --Túrelio (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Ne, Lizenz war drinn. Hatte aber ein zweites Bild als gallery drinn und die verhinderte die Lizenzangabe. Dawar wohl die Syntax falsch.Trotzdem mercy. --HOWI (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

HSBC ad

Hello Túrelio, just to inform you (in case you didn't read the related discussion page yet) about my opinion about the existing exception made in French jurisprudence, regarding artworks photographed or filmed in public places. Following details are into the Common's page I linked to in the discussion. Regards, Lspiste (talk) 13:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I had seen it already and left a comment. --Túrelio (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of pic from page

Turelio: I would like to know why you deleted a picture of Dov Moran and under what authority you did this.(Removing "Dov_Moran.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright) My company owns the copyright to this picture and you have no right whatsoever to delete it. Explain please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryesbee (talk • contribs)

Hi Larryesbee,

though this (and the path to a solution) has been already explained to you here, I'll explain it again: As you had been notified on your talkpage, this file had been requested for speedy-deletion by a recent-upload-patroler due to suspicion of being a copyvio, as it had been found spread over the internet, whereas you had claimed it to be from "February ‎17, ‎2015". While "suspicion of copyvio" may sound harsh for an honest uploader, fact is that about 10-20 percent of the new uploads to Commons are indeed copyvios. As the nominator's deletion-rationale was reasonable, I have deleted the file (as any other elected administrator on this project would have done) to avoid a copyright-infringement by re-users.

So, per your above statement you suggest that you represent a company which owns the copyright of this image. If that is indeed the case and if your company has really the right to release this image under a cc-by-sa license (which allows any kind of use, including commercial use), then please ask the legal department/representative of your company, using the template at Commons:OTRS#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries, to confirm your rightsholdership and your intent to release the image under the said license towards permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (for details, see Commons:Permission). --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Wheeler light fixtures image by marjorie kaufman.jpg

Hello, my friend. You tagged an image as no permission. I think it is probably okay. Please see the userpage of the uploader: User:MiltonPoint aka Marjorie Kaufman. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Bilder aus Zeitschrift "Orchids"

Hallo Túrelio, könntest Du bitte folgende Bilder auf Verletzung von copyrights überprüfen:

• File:Cattleya dowiana subsp. dowiana (Bateman & Rchb.f.) A.H.Kent.jpg
• File:Cattleya dowiana subsp. dowiana f. carmoniana Pupulin, fma. nov..jpg
• File:Cattleya dowiana subsp. dowiana f.rosita (Pfau) Pupulin, stat. nov..jpg
  

Quelle:
http://www.epidendra.org/LITERATURE/Pupulin%202015%20-%20Cattleya%20dowiana%20carmoniana/Pupulin%202015%20-%20Cattleya%20dowiana%20carmoniana.pdf

Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done, Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

help request about uploading

Hello Turelio. I want upload a picture to commons (photo of a Turkish author -Perihan Magden-, its important for improve to her article). But I don't know this image's license, free or not. Could you help me about upload to this image (link: [2]) (I heard images of this site, already uploadable to commons, with attirblte(?) licence, for exaple like this [3].)--Rime 11:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Rime,

sorry for the late reply, I was busy in RL.

The image in question is credited to Tomasz Kowalski. I am not aware that the content on amazon.com is under a general license that is compatible to our requirements of Commons (Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses). Therefore, a permission from the photographer would be required.

If you do not find another photo of Perihan Magden under a free license, I would recommend you to contact her directly and ask her whether she can provide a photo for which she has the full copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Marktbrunnen_Mayen_Frontansicht.JPG

Hallo Turelio,

laut Commons soll ich die Datei kategorisieren. Ich hab keine Ahnung, wie. In der Beschreibung, wie das funktionieren soll (hier) wird von Seiten gesprochen, aber das ist ja keine Seite, sondern eine Datei.

Ich habe das bei meinen ganzen Bildern, die ich bisher hochgeladen, immer elegant umgangen, indem ich einfach gar nichts gemacht habe, weil ich das einfach nicht verstehe, wie das funktioniert. Würde es aber gerne mal richtig machen. Kannst Du mir das mal so erklären, dass ich das kapiere?

Viele Grüße, --Goldener Käfer (talk) 11:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Goldener Käfer

hat etwas gedauert, da busy. Ich habe 2 mir sinnvoll erscheinende cats hinzugefügt.

Tatsächlich muss man sich etwas mit dem Kat.system auskennen, wenn man es so aus dem Stand machen will. Ansonsten ist ein möglicher Weg zu dem Wikipedia-Artikel, in dem das Bild gezeigt wird, zu gehen und zu schauen, welche Kategorien der hat. Wenn es sogar den gleichen Artikel auf der engl. Wikipedia gibt, dann ist es noch einfacher. Du nimmst dann einfach die passend erscheinenden Kategorien aus dem Wikipedia-Artikel und schaust, ob es die auch auf Commons gibt, was aber nicht zwingend der Fall ist. Sofern nicht vorhanden, muss man ggf. eine allgemeinere Kat. wählen. Es gab z.B. keine Kat. für "Brunnen in Mayen", weshalb ich "Fountains in Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz" nehmen musste. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hm. Ok, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort (ich habs nicht kapiert). Aber ich will auch nicht groß nochmal nachfragen. Unklar ist mir weiterhin, wie denn nun eine Kategorie zugeordnet wird. Du sagst "Du hast die genommen". Naja, ich guck mal ob ich es irgendwie selbst hinbekomme. Liebe Grüße, --Goldener Käfer (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Ach so, dir gehst nur um den praktischen Vorgang. Nun, entweder klickst du auf der jeweiligen Bildseite auf "Bearbeiten" und fügst manuell [[Category:NameDerKategorie]] ein oder du aktivierst zunächst in deinen Benutzereinstellungen beim Reiter "Helferlein" > Kategoriehelferlein "Hot Cat". Danach siehst auf auf jeder Bildseite unten neben den Kategoriename + und - Zeichen, sowie am Ende ein (+). Wenn du auf letzteres klickst, öffnet sich ein Fenster, in dem du den Namen der neuen Kategorie eingeben kannst. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Jetzt komme ich der Sache langsam näher. In Zukunft kann ich alleine eine Kategorie hinzufügen, dank deines Tipps. Aber um mal beim Beispiel zu bleiben. Ich habe noch eine Nachfrage. Du sagst, du hast einfach die Kategorie "Fountains in Landkreis Mayen-Koblenz" genommen. Das ist gut, hätte ich dann auch so gemacht. Nur wie hast Du denn diese vorhandene Kategorie gefunden? Ich meine, wie kann ich in Commons nach vorhandenen Kategorien suchen? Ich weiß dass ich nerve aber ich muss das wissen um in Zukunft alleine zurecht zu kommen. --Goldener Käfer (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Die Prinzipien dazu habe ich doch in meiner 1. Antwort erklärt. Konkret habe ich hier einfach im Suche-Feld Fountains und Mayen eingegeben, dann auf eines der ausgeworfenen Bilder geklickt und geschaut welche Kategorie da vorhanden ist. Dann habe ich auf diese Kat. geklickt und geschaut ob es nicht doch eine spezifischere Unterkat. gibt, was aber nicht der Fall war. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, ich glaube ich habe es nun verstanden und werde das beim nächsten Upload probieren. Gruß, --Goldener Käfer (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Commonscat falsch?, odernicht WP konform?

Grüß Dich Túrelio. Habe fürdie WP-Seite >>>> [4] eine Cat erstellt und als Weblink eingestellt. Kannst Du ergründen warum revertiert wurde? Schönes Wochenende wünscht--HOWI (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Erledigt, war wohl in der falschen Version..--HOWI (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

File:House Raminten (3).jpg

Hello. Thx u for sent me a notification about the deletion. I don't really understand about the rules of Wiki commons, but as far as I know, as long as I don't take the banner or logo from web but instead to take it by myself with my camera, it still ok. I read it once somewhere here in commons, but I don't remember where. But if I get it wrong OR the rules has changed since the last time I read it, I want to tell you that I upload another 4 banner photos. The Waroeng of Raminten, Gudeg Bu Amad, gudeg Yu Djum, and Gudeg Yu Narni. All of those are my own photograph of the banner. Please delete it, too. Well, although I know that the owners of those banner won't mind if I upload it, but I just don't want to break Commons' rule. Sorry for bothering, but next time, if you don't mind, please chat me on my Indonesian user talk :D I rarely open commons except I want to upload photos. Fortunately I get your notification via my email. Thank you for your hard work and sorry for bothering. Okkisafire (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I'll give you the links of the other four tomorrow. Please delete it, too. It's almost midnight here now :D . I just asked my friend about it and he said that I got it wrong. I should upload it on local wiki, not on commons. Thank you again, something like this always stresses me up. Okkisafire (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Okkisafire,

no need to be stressed about, as this happens even to experienced contributors. When you take a photography of a work of art (statue, sculpture, exceptional building) or of something, which might itself be copyrighted (billboard with advertisement, etc.), you are possibly infringing the copyright of the original creator of that work, provided it is still copyrighted (creator dead since 70 years?). Some countries have exceptions from copyright for works which are permanently installed in public space. This exception is called Freedom of panorama. However, the copyright-law of Indonesia has no usable Freedom of panorama-exception. Your image showed an advertisement, which might (or not) be copyrighted. --Túrelio (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Here it goes. Please delete these files, too:

50px50px50px.

How about the photograph of postcards which are freely distributed as souvenirs by the owner? Or the photograph of some photos which are hanged on the shop's wall by its owner? Do I stil need to ask the owner to send an email to Commons or it already is described as "free use"? Okkisafire (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

And how about these files:

50px

Are these described as "Freedom of Panorama"? Actually I want to show the car, not the banner. And the second pict, I want to show the traditional packaging with bamboo basket, unfortunatelly it contains the logo of Yu Djum restaurant. If it does against the rule, please delete it also :D . Sorry for bothering you. Okkisafire (talk) 01:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Okkisafire,

I have speedy-tagged File:Waroeng of raminten.jpg, File:Yu narni (2).jpg and File:Gudeg yu Djum (3).jpg. I don't see a problem with File:Hj amad (2).jpg, as it IMO contains no creative content.

File:Gudeg yu Djum (5).jpg: If you just want to show the car, you could simply blank out the section showing the poster (and replace it by a dark grey).

File:Gudeg yu Djum (2).jpg is a borderline case, IMO. Do you know how old the image of the depicted woman is?

--Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Better to delete all the pics. Actually, the car will be useless if I color it with grey lol. I do not kjow how old the image, but I know that the old woman is still alive, more than 80 years old by now. She is the owner of the franchise. And about Hj. Amad (2), that's a banner. I don't really understand what is creative content, but that banner has the logo and address of the franchise. It just the same as the other banner. Okkisafire (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I've deleted File:Gudeg yu Djum (2).jpg, as the portrait will still be in copyright if the woman is alive.

In regard to File:Gudeg yu Djum (5).jpg, I recommended you to blank out only the section showing the poster, not the total car. --Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Request delete of image from history+add comments

Hi,

This request is concerning the photograph of Siegfried Selberherr [1]. More precisely, could you please:

1. Delete the photo uploaded by me on February 23, 2015 from the 'file history'? Reason: This photo contains a wrong orientation in the EXIF meta data, resulting in a wrong, rotated representation in some web browsers. A newer, fixed version has been uploaded by me on the day after, February 24, 2015. Therefore, the photo uploaded on Feb 23 is obsolete and can be seen as an unecessary 'duplicate' (hence, my inquiry).

2. If possible, please add the following comment to the photo uploaded on Feb 24, 2015: "This photograph was taken on February 21, 2015."

2. If possible, please add the following comment to the photo uploaded on May 30, 2011: "This photograph was taken on May 1, 2005."

Thank you very much for your efforts!

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Siegfried_Selberherr.jpg

Billisbrother (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Billisbrother,

I've performed the version-deletion per 1. Adding comments to the table showing the file versions isn't possible, AFAIK. However, the description-template shows already the correct shot-date for the currently presented image-version. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Billisbrother (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Copy rights

Does croping a picture really count as copy right. It might for some occasions but in this why does it count as copy right i totally changed the original picture and focused on particular subject. And the picture for Ayoub Kalantari is out online it is being used publically so i think that shouldn't be a problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeysoccertennis (talk • contribs)

Hi Hockeysoccertennis,

cropping an existing image is not really a creative act, so it does not earn you any own copyright in the resulting work. But even if it would give you an own copyright, it would not take away the copyright of the original creator of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeysoccertennis (talk • contribs)

razmujin uploads

Después de ser advertida de posible violación de copyrigth aclare ser autora de la foto y proporcione el enlace a flickr con la licencia. Por qué me borraste la foto? --Razmujin (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Razmujin,

are you talking about File:Lucía Torres.jpg? If yes, the EXIF data of this image credit Lucas Cuello as the photographer. If you are indeed Lucas Cuello, then please send a confirmation from the official domaine lucascuello.com to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of image file File:R2.jpg

Hi I have received the image file directly from the author and uploaded it. I am not sure why it got deleted. Could you please let me know which creative commons would it come under? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvdhope (talk • contribs)

Hi Jvdhope,

as a general remark: material on Facebook is not free per se, besides of the fact that we never can be sure whether the poster is really the original author.

To be allowed to upload the image R2.jpg (name is too short and unspecific) to Commons under a free license, you need to contact Reshma Valliappan and ask him to confirm his authorship and to issue a permission under a free license (see: COM:L) and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. For a permission template see Commons:Email_templates#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_inquiries. --Túrelio (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Woman japanese.jpg

自分で描いた絵の著作権は自分にあると思うが、写真にすると著作権を侵害したとなるというのは、なかなか理解しがたい。--ToshiJapon (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi ToshiJapon,

I don't understand Japanese. As the depicted painting is available on the web ([5]) I assume you are not the painter. Therefore you need to provide a permission from the painter. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of my category

Hi,

Could I please know why you deleted my category FP by SuperJew?

--SuperJew (talk) 05:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, sure: It had been tagged for deletion by User:Hydro because it was empty. As being empty is a valid speedy-rationale for categories, I've deleted it. If you prefer to have it remain despite being empty every now and then, you may recreate it and add the code {{empty category}} . This will prevent deletion even if being empty. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to keep it. Could you undo the deletion please? --SuperJew (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --SuperJew (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Ban appeal reference

I mentioned you as a reference for this year's ban appeal. I sent you a copy of my appeal to them via Email (please check your inbox). ArbCom might ask you about your thoughts on allowing me return and ask you to recommend restrictions and such. I recommended you since you were there since the beginning. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

File:DoingSpirometry.JPG

This photograph (made by me) corresponds to a friend of mine, she is a Catalan administrative of the Centre d'Assistència Primària (community health center) of Bisbal d'Empordà. And he has not filed any request for deletion of photography and less Italian!. She may look like another person.--Jmarchn (talk) 13:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. But it wasn't me who nominated it for deletion. I just provided the translation, as not everybody understands Italian. --Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hello I was uploaded some photos in Persian Mastiff page and you dear friend, deleted them. i took those photos from dog owners and dog trainers who own those dogs. I know that people and they have no problem with using that photos for introduce this dogs, so i wish you can bring them back to Persian Mastiff page.

warmly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Mastiff

• File:Ghad.jpg
• File:Pupies.jpg
• File:Hight sarabi.jpg
• File:Face sarabi.jpg
• File:سگ سرابی نر1.jpg
• File:سگ سرابی نر.jpg
• File:سرابی بنام مشکی.JPG

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yboroon (talk • contribs)

Hi Yboroon,

though I did no delete these files, I had indeed tagged them for deletion. The problem is that only such images are allowed to be uploaded to Commons, that are legally free to be used for any purpose, including commercial uses, see COM:L. For example, any re-user would be legally entitled to print the photo on postcards and sell these postcards. This is very different from getting a simple o.k. for using a photo in Wikipedia. You need to provide a written permission from the photographer(s) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . This Commons' policy. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Bitte

Hi Túrelio! Könntest du einmal nachgucken, ob dieses Foto womöglich dasselbe ist wie dieses gelöschte? Falls ja, fehlt eine Freigabe (war nur verbal permission by the photographer to upload the pic on WP). Danke! --Martina talk 21:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Martina, nein, es sind verschiedene Fotos. Das gelöschte wirkt um Längen professioneller; hier war ja auch eine Fotografin (Nadja Klier) angegeben.--Túrelio (talk)

Okay, danke fürs Nachschauen! --Martina talk 12:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Turelio

Hi, the file Tararache1.jpg does not violate any copyright. I am the one in the picture and it was taken by my people, for me, at a press conference.

Thank you very much.

MT — Preceding unsigned comment added by DorianH (talk • contribs)

Hi MT,

if the photo has not been shot by yourself, then you are not the author and the current author-entry is wrong. Releasing a work (photo) under a free license, which allows anybody to use it for any purpose, is a legal act. Therefore, we do need a valid release from the creator of this photo. So, you need to ask the photographer to send a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which he/she needs to state his/her authorship in this photo and his will to release it under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

I know

After uploading File:Masala dosa with chutneys.jpg i found it was copyrighted , so I wanted to delete myself but don't know how to do it. And can you check whether I did right here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Subrahmanyan_Chandrasekhar_harvard.jpg --Cosmic Emperor (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

O.k. What/Who is "AIP" and when might this photo have been shot? --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I saw the name mentioned in the source. And Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar was born in 1910 , almost 105 years ago. The pic was during his youth . So you can imagine how old the pic is.That's why i thought Public Domain as old pics become public domain--Cosmic Emperor (talk) 06:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

You need to find out, when and where this photo had been shot. The source-information "AIP" might help with that. Only then we can evaluate which country's legislation is relevant here. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

AIP is American Institute of Physics , and this is the page - http://www.aip.org/history/acap/biographies/bio.jsp?chandrasekhars

This is the policy for usage of that pic - https://photos.aip.org/use-policy --Cosmic Emperor (talk) 07:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. But, what's written on the AIP site is a no-go for us. They just have collected images from different sources and authors. That's typical U.S.-"fair use". We cannot use such material. So far, we only know, that the immediate source-site got the photo from the AIP archive, which per se does not claim to be the author. So, you might either contact AIP and ask them for more information about the author and year of creation of the photo, or search the webs by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

I found the date as 1938 here - http://www.nbi.dk/cgi-bin/search-nba?form=1&katAll=1&katS=on&mode=Search%20archive&search . the person who took the picture can be an unknown photographer who is completely forgotten . --Cosmic Emperor (talk) 07:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Yann has found that it is from 1934 and has the caption "Portrait of a young Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar as Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge". This suggests that is has been shot in the U.K. Today, the U.K. has protection for 70 years pma[6]. However, I don't know how it was in 1934; might have been shorter. --Túrelio (talk)

As Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar in 1934 was shortly after his PhD, he might have gone to a photographer by himself. This would fit to the sentence "gift of Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar" in the image caption. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - from the start of 1912 to the end of 1995 the UK copyright term was pma+50 years for an author who died on or before 31 December 1945. From 1 January 1996 onwards, any work that was still under copyright had the period extended to pma+70 years, which affect works by authors who died on or after 1 January 1946, because the fifty year period would not have run out yet. Much like the unpopular URAA, copyright was also restored to works by authors who died 1926-1945. Green Giant (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Black Death file

Sorry my mistake --Joao Astronomo (talk) 18:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

ACK. Next time just use different filename. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Tegel

Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Bildhauer hätte ich fast vergessen, habe ich aber gerade nachgeholt. Panoramafreiheit denke ich ist gegeben: Öffentlich zugänglicher Raum im Flughafen (Abflughalle). OTFW (talk) 06:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi OTFW, Danke. Aber bzgl. Geltung leider nein, siehe de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium_„öffentlich“. In D. sind Innenräume leider ausgeschlossen. Wenn der Künstler noch lebt, könnte sich eine direkte Anfrage bei ihm lohnen. Damit war ich auch gelegentlich erfolgreich. --Túrelio (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Deleted photos

Hello, I am having some issues with photos. I have the authorization of the authors, but the pictures got deleted and I got a second warning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalburov9 (talk • contribs)

Hi Kalburov9 ,

if you really got permission, then forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Überprüfung

Hallo Túrelio, könntest Du bitte die Bilder vom heutigen Tage hier: [7] auf die Rechte überprüfen. Ich danke Dir und grüße Dich. Orchi (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done, auf die Schnelle. --Túrelio (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

...danke. Orchi (talk) 20:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Move to Commons

Hallo Túrelio, bist Du so lieb und verschiebst diese Datei: [8] nach Commons? Ich könnte die gut gebrauchen :) Danke, --Nicola (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Ich hatte die Nachricht auf :en schon gesehen, war aber den ganzen Tag über beruflich unterwegs. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Ich dachte, ich hätte Dir auf Commons geschrieben :) und fands hier passender. --Nicola (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Voila: File:Lautrec poster, Huret using a Simpson chain behind the Gladiator tandem pacer at Velodrome de la Seine circa 1890.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Deleted photo

Hi, you deleted the photo I uploaded.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/elsevenuk/17251917382/in/album-72157651743953708/

According to flickr site I "must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made" and I did it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jm131131 (talk • contribs)

Hi Jm131131,

that's correct, but it's not all. As you can see from the icons at right below the image[9], it is under a CC-licence, which does not permit commercial use (NC) or creating derivatives (ND). Both of which are a precondition for material uploaded to Commons, per COM:L. So, this image is simply not free enough to be permitted on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of photo

I received a notification from you that a picture that I uploaded may be deleted. The next day the picture was deleted. I appealed this action by providing proof that I have permission from the copyright holders to use the photo several days ago but have heard no reply. Please contact me at your earliest convenience.

Thank you,

Andrew Hughes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahughes33 (talk • contribs)

Hi Andrew,

are you refering to File:Crunk Witch.jpg? If yes: material on facebook is not free per se. In addition, the Facebook account-holder might not be the copyright-holder. To where did you provide the above mentioned permission? The most recent image description did not contain any hint about a pending permission. Our team for the handling of permissions is OTRS. As they are also volunteers, it may take some time until you get a response. If they judge a permission as valid, they may restore the image by themselves. Alternatively, you ask may the volunteer who processes your request, to notify me. I can then restore the image. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Film studios by country

Hello, I noticed you deleted the said category. That raised me a question: are we sure that Film studios are the same as Film production companies? Take Cinecittà in Rome, for example. It's a film studios but not a film production company. Same i.e. for Pinewood, or Shepperton Studios in England. In my opinion there should be two separate categories but I would like to hear your opinion too. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Honestly, I just performed the speedy-deletion, as requested by User:Vantey. I don't have an informed opinion about that. I would recommend you to look at :en-Wikipedia, whether they discriminate between the two terms and look at Commons whether we have media which qualifying for each of the 2 terms. For less knowledgable people, such as me, the term "Film studio" might be more common. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Btsthuphuong.jpg & File:Thu Phuong013.JPG

Hi, Túrelio. I'm very appreciated for your concern about the photos I uploaded. Actually, we are working with the artist Thu Phương, we have her permission to use all her photos we have worked with like those in her liveshow or her videoclips. So, thanks alot for your concern, but I guarantee that this is not any copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tranlamhp (talk • contribs)

Hi Tranlamhp,

could you please ask the artist to send an email confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 11:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

category:Built in Norway 1943

hello, this category is an empty category, cause I made a mistake. The right name of the category is Built in Norway in 1943. - Greetings --Sjokolade (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

RE: File:Popedotting4.gif

Fixed, although I'm going to ask a Meta sysop to restore the original there, since I don't believe that the modified version here at Commons does the graph's creator much justice. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. However, even on meta it should be labeled as fair-use IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 13:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Image issues between Thiagofernandob and EricEgo2012?

You dealt with EricEgo2012 (talk · contribs) a few weeks ago on a block for uploading inappropriate commercial images of actresses; I'm getting the feeling they're trying to kill collateral damage to their en.wiki account by using the new account Thiagofernandob (talk · contribs) and this Flickr account to try to get their preferred images up, if you could check this; I've already reverted Thiagofernandob's adds on en.wiki. Thanks. Nate • (chatter) 11:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Nate, thanks. Though I didn't know of the connection, I recognized File:Adrienne Eliza Bailon.jpg as clearly Flickr-washing. So far, my research didn't yield any external hits for File:KielyWilliams.jpg, though I've no doubt that it's also a copyvio. Anyway, I've proposed to include the Flickr-account in our bad-list at Commons:Questionable Flickr images. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Photo Removal

Hi, I am Frank L Ridley. I uploaded and own the rights to the photos you deleted from my wiki page.Both the imdb head shot and the Sold poster image are mine. Jbaysinger has my full permission. If you have a suggestion as to how to keep others from deleting it. that would be helpful. Thanks. FR

5/08/15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemuel Gengulphus Trotter (talk • contribs)

Hi FR,

I have no idea to what you are relating, as there is no deletion associated with your account. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

You are probably relating to File:Actor Frank Ridley Portrait.jpeg, which had been uploaded by User:Jbaysinger. He had emptied his talkpage. Therefore, I didn't find it immediately. In relation to the portrait-shot: did you really shoot it by yourself or did you just pay a photographer to do it? In the latter case you need to be sure that you acquired enough rights to release the image under a free license, which allows anybody to use this image for any purpose, provided the license-terms are met. Otherwise you would be exposing yourself to litigation by the photographer. If you are sure about that, then send an email from your business email account to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) in which you should state your rights in this image and your will to release it under the choosen license. After you have send this email, you may drop me a note, so that I can temporarily undelete the image, until an OTRS-volunteer has checked the permission and put a "ticket" on the page. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

The same applies to File:Honest Gil Fulbright SOLD Poster.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Please help me to understand how to get the Linda E. Ginzel photo posted and thanks!

Good day to you- Could you please help me to get the Linda E. Ginzel photo posted? I have written permission to use that photo and since it was deleted, I cannot repost it. Appreciate your assistance here. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerudap (talk • contribs)

Hi Nerudap,

did you receive any confirmation from OTRS that the permission was found to be valid? I wonder as you uploaded the image (File:Ginzel.jpeg) on Sept. 29 and until it was deleted (Novemb. 6) there was no change in the OTRS-pending tag. --Túrelio (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Verschieberechte?

Hallo Túrelio, kannst Du mir mal die Seite verlinken, wo vermerkt ist, wie man Verschiebeberechtigter auf Commons werden kann. Muss man dazu Com-Admin sein und wenn ja, sind die Adminwahlen ähnlich anstrengend wie auf de-WP? Ich muss jetzt im Rahmen der Nachkategorisierung ständig Bilder verschieben und da wäre das schon praktisch. Vielen Dank und viele Grüße, --Geolina163 (talk) 06:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Geolina,

einfach der Anleitung oben auf Commons:Requests for rights folgen oder direkt im Abschnitt Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover deinen Eintrag anlegen. Sollte bei dir kein Problem, die zu erhalten. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke, für die schnelle Antwort und viele Grüße aus Köln, --Geolina163 (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Re: File:Daru, Mayushii, Okarin.jpg and similar crops

(Excuse me for my poor english)

Thanks for your suggestion, I was searching the right tag for the copyright... I will correct all my contributions (croppoed images) in this mode. --Bradipo Lento (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Changes made! --Bradipo Lento (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Photo Alfred Leroux

Cette photo est tirée d'achives familiales dont je suis dépositaire d'une part, elle a déjà été utilisée par des médias dans le domaine public d'autre part (couverture de livre par exemple), il est donc faux de dire qu'elle viole le droit d'auteur. Ce n'est aucunement le cas. Hardenberg13 (talk) 18:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Description

Kannst du bitte ändern dieser Beschreibung? --C3r4 (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page

Hello. I am new user. JEJUGEO My page was deleted could you tell me what is reason for that.... :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by JEJUGEO (talk • contribs)

Hi JEJUGEO,

in case you are refering to your so-called userpage User:JEJUGEO: it was deleted because its content was out of Commons' scope, as it consisted mainly in promotional information about Jeju Geo. Commons is not Facebook and userpages on Commons are not to be used for promotional activity. Your gallery-page JEJUGEO was also deleted for being out of scope. Your upload File:Yongmeori Tuff Ring Geo Trail.jpg was deleted due to suspicion of being a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08)

re: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twobells#File_tagging_File:HMS_Queen_Elizabeth_alongside_HMS_Illustrious.jpg

Dear Turelio

I have emailed the permission and a link to the source material, the licence while clear comes in a rather roundabout manner, in that, the Aircraft Carrier Alliance is the source but the Ministry of Defence is the author and as such under the OGL licence, with this in mind, I have contacted the ACA and requested clarification and a blanket permission for all their images which Wiki Commons can hold on permanent record, regards. Twobells (talk) 11:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Twobells,

I didn't assume it to be a copyvio, just a missing license. When you are in still in processing permissions, just add {{OTRS pending}} as a temporary measure. Anything about File:British Army sniper team.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Autorisation photo Pierre Saint-Paul par André Morain

Bonjour, pour le fichier File: Pierre Saint-Paul, photo André Morain 1999.jpg, j'ai l'accord d'André Morain, je lui ai fait parvenir une lette type, il doit la renvoyer à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org.

Bien cordialement, --Philippe HENRION (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

O.k. I have changed the problem-tag to OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Photo Deletion

Hi! I inserted a photo on the page for Camren Bicondova... I'm lost as heck on this whole photo selection thing. Even if I find or have an image that seems to be under "free use" I have no idea which commons selection to indicate and thus it always gets deleted. I've read the help section on this repeatedly, but I just don't get it. I don't suppose you could have mercy on my Wiki-illiterate soul and help me out here? There's a million press photos of this actress seemingly available for use but I have no idea what would be acceptable for use on Wikipedia and the past couple times I've tried, they've been flagged for deletion. HELP? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triskele84 (talk • contribs)

Hi Triskele84,

the image File:Camren Bicondova San Diego Comic Con 2014.png, which you had uploaded, could be traced to Getty Images agency[10], which is known worldwide for suing anybody who uses their images without paying for.

As a general remark, "press photos" are not suitable to be uploaded to Commons. Though they are "freely" distributed to the press, they are not under a license, which is free enough for Commons. As another general note: highly professionally looking shots of actors/actresses are rather rarely created by amateurs/volunteers, who offer them under a free license, but rather by professional photographers, who sell/license them for money. So, when you find suitable images of your actor/actress of choice on Flickr, you have to keep that in mind, even if the photo is offered under a free license. You cannot always trust the claimed license on Flickr and alike, you have to use your brain. There are a few exceptions, such as Eva Rinaldi and Gage Skidmore, who are professional celebrity-photographers and offer a lot of material under a Commons-campatible license on Flickr. --Túrelio (talk)

Turelio, this time I selected an image that according to the owner was specifically allowed for use under the proper license as selected when uploaded to Wiki Commons. This particular image should NOT have been deleted from the Camren Bicondova article. This one (https://www.flickr.com/photos/jagrap/14567899397/) clearly states on the Flickr page for the photo that it was "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic" which is what I selected upon uploading to Commons. Please undo the deletion of this image. --Triskele84

Regrettably, this image is not free enough for Commons. As you can see from the icon with the striken-through $ sign, it is limited to non-commercial uses. Per our policy COM:L, such a restriction is not allowed on Commons. Commons-allowed CC-licenses are CC-Zero, CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. Not allowed are CC-..-NC, CC-..-ND and CC-..-NC/ND. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Why then is "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic" an option in the upload process? It's incredibly misleading, making one believe that kind of an image IS acceptable... strange, and frustrating. What about an image from an actual actor's Instagram or Facebook profile that they own. Would that be allowed, as it is owned by the actual actor in question and used on their page? --Triskele84

In which upload-process? If you call Upload on Commons, go to section B and then click on Flickr, you get this, which clearly shows which licenses are allowed and which are not.

We cannot accept images from Instagram and Facebook without an expressed permission being sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as both hosters do not check authorship and licensing of user's uploads. They are simply not reliable in this regard. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Personal images

About this edit, you say they are in use. Please check this page, which has nothing to do with the present image. They are all personal images. I guess as per wiki commons personal images are not permitted, as it is not a web hosting.--Vin09 (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, the :en page is about a village. The depicted old man might be a relevant personality from that village. That needs still to be shown, of course, as I wrote.

I don't understand why you let the personal images remain in en:Talveda, whereas you removed the image of the temple building.[11] That doesn't make sense. In general, apart from clear-cut cases, we on Commons do not decide which images are to be used on the projects. So, as long as an image is in use, we host it (with exception, of course). So, I would recommend to first trim the image-load of the :en article. Thereafter the unused images might be deleted form Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Fine, actually I kept them for proof that there are some personal images. Else, I would've removed them. But the temple image which you pointed has no place to add, as it is still a stub article. I guess we can keep important images and move the others to wiki commons as per Gallery. Anyway thanks for your help. Cheers.--Vin09 (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

O.k. Now I've deleted several of the images, but kept File:Naveen4.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your intervention.--Vin09 (talk) 09:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Luca Wackermann

Wow! You're the fastest sysop on commons! It's the first time I can't copy&paste the warning on the author's page after I asked for deletion. As I can't look at the history anymore, I can't see his/her name. Could you please warn that user for me? Thanks in advance--Formica rufa (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

To which file you are refering? --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Something containing the words Luca Wackermann. Let me check on it.wiki.--Formica rufa (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Here it is: WACKERMANNLUCA.jpg. I found it while patrolling on it.wiki--Formica rufa (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I've notified the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:BCS Championship Media Day, Jan. 5, 2013.jpg

Hey can you take a second look at this image. The license has been updated. Dolenath (talk) 04:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done. However, I see a potential second problem. If the trophy itself is considered an artwork, we need a permission from its creator/designer. --Túrelio (talk) 05:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

User_talk:Túrelio#Personal_images

I've missed this image as per our discussion at User_talk:Túrelio#Personal_images.--Vin09 (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am not sure to which image you are refering. File:Naveen4.jpg has now been deleted by an admin-colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

response

File:U 1116417803 bi4eto.jpg is from here http://photo-forum.net/index.php?APP_ACTION=GALLERY_IMAGE&IMAGE_ID=125860 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realiesone (talk • contribs)

Hi, thanks. However, there is still no permission/free license from the author. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello

Hola muy buenas tardes soy P Cesar Maldonado, y hablo español, es por eso que te escribo en este idioma, la imagen que tu la eliminaste, fue creada por mi personas, por lo cual no esta violando los derechos de autor, espero que lo tomes en cuentas y espero las disculpas correspondientes por lo sucedido, que tengas buen dia.--P Cesar Maldonado (talk) 22:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Hola P Cesar Maldonado,

no sabo sufficiente español para communicar bien. Para esto: if you own the full copyright for this image, please send an email to permissions-commons-es@wikimedia.org, like this Declaración de permiso, in which you should state that you hold the copyright for this portrait photo and that you wish to release it under a cc-by-sa-4.0 license (email can be in Spanish). However, it is also important to provide the name of the real photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Remove from the internet

Hi,

I need to know, When a page has been deleted from the Wikipedia, How long will it take to be removed from the Internet (search engines).

Thanks, Chemcol (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Chemcol, I have no idea. Surely it depends on how long the page/file had been online. --Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Tags on File:Brooke-de-Lench.JPG and File:SuperSikhCover.jpg

Hello Turelio, Thank you for your notifications about the File:Brooke-de-Lench.JPG and File:SuperSikhCover.jpg. However, the pictures release licenses are being sent by the copyright owners themselves. I may have taken some time to insert the appropriate code during the upload process. Thank you for your patience. Valenciatist (talk) 17:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Valenciatist,

do I understand you correctly, that permissions/releases by the copyright owners for these 2 images have been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS)? If yes, you can insert {{OTRS pending}} on the filepages by yourself or I can do it for you. --Túrelio (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Turelio,

That is correct. The copyright owners of these 2 images have sent the releases to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I have attempted to show you the appropriate code in my previous message but it appeared as an image. Would you mind restoring these two images that have been deleted so fast? Thank you for your understanding and patience. Valenciatist (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Valenciatist,

I've removed the no-perm-tag from File:Brooke-de-Lench.JPG. However, File:SuperSikhCover.jpg had already been deleted by a colleague, which is no surprise as we get a lot of movie posters, most of which are copyvios. I recommend you notify me the moment you get a positive signal from OTRS; I can then undelete the file. --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Turelio,

Thanks, I appreciate your action on File:Brooke-de-Lench.JPG and will let you know when I have news about File:SuperSikhCover.jpg . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valenciatist (talk • contribs)

userpage Marcelo Musarra

Hi Turélio Why did you block my page? It seem to be that you did it because you felt that my page is "out of scope", as is shown by the attached picture.

Page of Marcelo Musarra deleted becouse Turélio believed tha it is "out of scope"

Please, let me know what I did that is "out of scope".

Thanks, best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelo Musarra (talk • contribs)

Hi Marcelo Musarra,

I have deleted it because the content was merely promotional and thereby out of our scope. So far, you have no contributions/uploads to Commons. In case you want to contribute valuable/useful free content to Commons, you should do so. In that case you can put on your userpage some information about use (such as language skills) which is of use for other Commons' user who want to communicate with you. However, if you actually do not want to contribute content to Commons, you should not use Commons as a substitute for Facebook. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

err?

I think you need to restore File:Coral Garden.jpg, which you deleted with the reasoning "[https://www.flickr.com/photos/climateofourfutureorg/4360557216/ Richard Ling says here he is not the creator, and that it is a copyright violation])". Richard never stated he wasn't the creator (I'm not going to quote it but read it carefully), he stated that Deborah W. reuploaded his photo without giving the source (see the EXIF which is still intact). Also this was a widely used image and was uploaded back in 2007. Bidgee (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done. I did actually take a look at the Flickr site, where the image is under a CC-NC license and which has a comment by Richard Ling: "Unfortunately this photo is not the work of the uploader (ie, it is a copyright violation); I would not recommend using it elsewhere on Flickr or linking to it from other sites." --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for undeleting, though admins need to double check in-depth and not rely on the nominator. Bidgee (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright

Hello. Can you take a look at these images [12], [13]. What does "donated in 1948" mean?--Melikov Memmed (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

They should be free, as being from 16xx and 17xx. Without further information I could imagine that "donated in 1948" means that the former owner of these painting donated them to the Kinsey Inst. However, that would be rather irrelevant in regard to copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Gelöschte Bilder - Lizenvereinbarung missachtet?

Hallo Túrelio,

leider musste ich feststellen das jene Bilder entfernt wurden, welche der Obi-Bildersammlung entspringen aber frei zur Nutzung verfügbar sind. Gerne wüde ich erfahren, wo genau gegen die Lizenzvereinbarungen verstoßen wurde.

Beste Grüße

Lukarsius

Hallo Lukarsius,

ich sehe, z.B. auf http://www.obi.de/de/pflanzenlexikon/sommerpflanzen/begonie/index.html, nirgendwo etwas von freier Lizenz. Dass etwas zur "kostenlosen" Nutzung angeboten wird, bedeutet nicht zwangsläufig dass es unter einer freien Lizenz steht, die auch kommerzielle Nutzung und die Erstellung von Bearbeitungen erlaubt, wie es uns Richtlinien (COM:L) verlangen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Add Photo w/ Copyright Permission Burnettlh (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

My boss is currently trying to upload a photo to her wiki that you recently deleted. It is a third party photo, but we've gotten permission from the photographer to release it onto wikipedia and would therefore like to try uploading it again if possible. However, I currently cannot do that due to the photo initially being marked as copyright infringement. As you seem to know about copyright policy on wikipedia, is there a way to re-upload the photo you've already taken down?

Leigh Burnettlh (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

This is a crosspost of what is essentially the same question asked at Commons:Upload help#Add Photo w/ Copyright Permission. I've replied to Burnettlh there. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, LX. --Túrelio (talk) 22:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Bitte wiederherstellen

Category:Naturschutzgebiet Blasienberg ist nicht mehr leer und hätte als Teil der für WLE erstellten, tendenziell vollständigen Schutzgebiets-Kategoriestruktur vermutlich auch im leeren Zustand nicht gelöscht werden sollen. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 00:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Gal lilos

hello Túrelio why did you remove my picture? i am suppose to write on this person as a work for my university. this is his picture! how can i make it ok? --Gal lilos (talk) 11:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gal lilos,

it has been deleted due to suspicion of being a copyvio, as it was found in the same or higher resolution at http://www.ece.rochester.edu/~friedman/ef.html. Who is the true photographer of this photo? --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

FletcherMunson ELC

Hi, I've just seen you removed the {{SD}} template from the following files:

• File:FletcherMunson ELC it.svg
• File:FletcherMunson ELC es.svg
• File:FletcherMunson ELC PL.svg

I put that template because I embedded all translations into the English version, that is File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg. As you can see if you open the description page of File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg, just above the {{Information}} template, there is a small drop-down menu, next to "Render this image in", which lets you change the language! The advantage is that all translations are embedded in one single file, which can be used in MediaWiki pages like this:

• English version: {{File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg}}
• Italian version: {{File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg|uselang=it}}
• Spanish version: {{File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg|uselang=es}}
• Polish version: {{File:FletcherMunson ELC.svg|uselang=pl}}

and this is the result.--Luca Ghio (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Ah, o.k. That explains it. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Bureaucrat

Thank you for your positive vote at Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Jameslwoodward. I will do my best to live up the trust you have put in me. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Deleting redirects

Hello can you please delete these redirect. There are unnecessary and confusing redirects since I've discovered that most of them are not actually the right funerals. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

• File:Liliuokalani lying in state3.jpg
• File:Funeral Procession of Liliuokalani - Flag and Kahili Bearers.jpg‎
• File:Funeral procession of Kalakaua1.jpg‎
• File:Funeral procession of Kalakaua.jpg‎
• File:Funeral Procession of Liliuokalani - Leaving Iolani Palace.jpg
• File:Funeral Procession of Liliuokalani - white figures marching.jpg‎

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Jean Louis François Richard

Hi Túrelio, thank you very much for Category:Jean Louis François Richard deleted. Sincerely --6PO 09:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Löschbegründung

Hallo Túrelio,

es wäre nett, wenn du zukünftig eine Löschbegründung angibst. Schöne Grüße --Yoursmile (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Oops; manchmal überträgt das Skript der Löschvorlage die Begründung des Antragstellers nicht korrekt in die Editzusammenfassung. Konkret war es hier wohl "leere Kategorie". --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, alles klar. Danke und schöne Grüße --Yoursmile (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Turkey general election leaflet

Hi Túrelio, what do you think this type leaflet? Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Fenerli1978,

1) in regard to whether the leaflet is copyrightable (merits copyright), IMO it is similar to File:Emine Ülker Tarhan, Anatolia Party - Izmir.JPG. It contains a real photography of the candidate and the portrait is a relevant part of the composition.

2) in regard to whether freedom-of-panorama is applicable here, it is clearly not.

I hope that answers your question.

As I am from Germany and know the situation with election posters from that country, I can direct you to Category:Election posters in Germany. You will see that there are only images of either very old elections posters containing candidate-portraits or such with a permission from the party. All other images from recent elections show elections posters containing only text. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Tijuana montage.jpg

Hola Túrelio, he agregado las fuentes del montaje de Tijuana, fue montaje creado a partir de siete imágenes en Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hachiroo (talk • contribs)

Gracias. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:20130118 Bing from the choral Terrace phil King.jpg - Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image !

Hi Túrelio

Flickr user Phil King has changed the license of the Flickr image and tagged it as "Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)" Could you please reconsider the case and restore the file "20130118 Bing from the choral Terrace phil King.jpg"  ? Would be great!

Panthera tigris tigris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panthera tigris tigris (talk • contribs)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

second Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image - File:20150110 Musiikkitalo hugovk.jpg

Hi Túrelio Thank you for updating so swiftly the picture of the Bing Concert Hall - it's now integrated in the article.

Also the flickr user Hugovk has answered quickly and tagged it to: Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0

Therefore please re-consider the deletion.

Merci !

P.T.T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panthera tigris tigris (talk • contribs)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Bitte

Hallo Túrelio, ich habe beim Erstellen von den unten aufgeführten Kategorien leider unterschiedliche Bindestriche benutzt. Nach Korrektur sind diese Kategorien nun als redirect gesetzt. Um Missverständnisse zu vermeiden, darf ich Dich bitten, diese Redirect - Kategorien zu löschen. Mit Dank und Gruß. Orchi (talk) 18:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done. Die Gedankenstrich-Variante hätte mir zwar etwas besser gefallen, aber dein Wille war mir Befehl. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

....ich hatte die von Dir nicht bevorzugte Variante schon einige hundert mal bei den Category:Orchidaceae botanical illustrations eingesetzt und ich versuche immer die gleiche Formatierung zu wählen. (Macht es vielleicht für einen Bot leichter, wenn man ihn mal braucht ;-) )Nochmals vielen Dank. Orchi (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Vedad

Hallo Turelio, hast Du gerade meinen speedy-Baustein durch einen Baustein ersetzt, der empfiehlt, einen speedy-Baustein zu setzen? --Ailura (talk) 06:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Nee, ich habe nur eine (unspezif.) Speedy durch eine (spezif.) Duplicate-speedy ersetzt. ;-) Soll das eigentlich wirklich gelöscht werden? Ich denke es ist ein gezielt erstellter crop des Originalfotos. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Das Originalfoto war noch größer und ist inzwischen durch einen crop überschrieben, ich sehen zu wenig Unterschied zwischen den aktuellen Versionen (und der Crop ist unbenutzt). --Ailura (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Wolf Image

Hi, I really like the image of a wolf you have used for your wolf page, where di you get it from and can i use it for a image i'm making? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.229.14 (talk • contribs)

Hi 92.27.229.14, I don't know what image you are talking about or what you mean by "your wolf page". Please give me a hint. --Túrelio (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

FoP in the U.S.

Just wanted to say thank you much (I mean it ^_^ !) for pointing out FoP to me :o ! Didn't know it was not allowed with public art here in the U.S. @o@ (and neither did a veteran editor that I am currently working with :o )... I'm in the process of trying to get some other images tidied up because of this issue along with adding appropriate the information. Honestly - I know it's just my opinion, but how sad is it when there are prominent pieces out there that spells out what your city made up of (talking about public artwork here ^_~ ), but then you're told, because of law, it must not be documented or seen other than the naked eye (or with an officially sanctioned photo) because somehow something that's 3D - turned into 2D, is the same thing :o (run-on sentence, sorry ~o~ ... and you can walk into some of these pieces just by straying off the public sidewalk a little but still not be able to take a photo >< ~)??? My answer - sad, sad, sad ~_~ ...

Anyways, thanks again with all sincerity ^^ ! Hanyou23 (talk) 06:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright in the U.S. is really a bit complicated, when considering the rules shown in File:PD-US table.svg. However, we are currently in danger of loosing freedom-of-panorama in Europe, as there is a legislatory vote on July 9th about a really bad reform; see Commons:Freedom of Panorama 2015 and meta:Freedom_of_Panorama_in_Europe_in_2015. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Sassus

Pourquoi tu as supprimé les images en disant que ça violé les droits d'auteurs alors que c'est de mon propre travail !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joan Benvegnu (talk • contribs)

Hi,

I had tagged the image as suspected of being a copyvio because I found it published earlier at http://racingstub.com/forum/comment/1327289#c1327289 and http://medias.lequipe.fr/img-photo-jpg/sassus-jean-luc/1500000000569601/6:88,2042:1115-665-335-70/fb962.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Stained glass

72.194.119.29 18:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Using exterior view of St Josef Church Aachen in a research documentary about post-war German stained glass. http://stainedglassmovie.com 72.194.119.29 18:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Adam Torres at Hotel Cafe.jpg

I was just looking at File:Adam Torres at Hotel Cafe.jpg when it disappeared. I can not find this image when following the provided link. There was plenty of other images but nothing that looks like this image. --Jarekt (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

See http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54c7165ce4b08936a99601e9/54fdef17e4b0580ebdc39fd3/54fdef24e4b092949a818efe/1425927975059/19_bw.jpg?format=500w . --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Michelle Chen In PNG Format 3.png

I uploaded the file following commons rule to the best of my knowledge, why would it be deleted, may I ask ? JW19335762743 (talk) 09:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Michelle Photo In PNG Format.png

I followed commons rules to the best of my knowledge, why would it be deleted ? JW19335762743 (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Right. These are special cases. You will note that both images were uploaded exactly today to the Flickr account from which you got them. On the other hand, these images were posted to IMDB already 1 month earlier[14][15]. This suggests that the Flickr-user is not the photographer, but instead copied these image from somewhere and uploaded them for the purpose of license-laundering. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Does the presence on IMDB back in May exclude the photos from possible free content status ? I　was not aware of the presence on IMDB until now, but I　do believe these photos are free for anyone to use. It's interesting that you are able to locate it on IMDB. JW19335762743 (talk) 09:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

RE:Your question: No. But in this overall scenario, it suggests that the Flickr-user is not the photographer or copyright-holder. If he/she is not, he/she cannot put the image under a free license. Only the photographer or copyright-holder can do that. --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Ｉ　do appreciate it. JW19335762743 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons-fähig?

Hallo, kann dieses Foto [16] nach Commons verschoben werden? Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Aufgrund des Dateinamens gehe ich davon aus, dass das Teil in Luxemburg steht. Angesichts von Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Luxembourg kannst du nur hoffen, die derzeitige Kampagne für europaweite Panoramafreiheit doch noch positive Früchte trägt und auch Luxemburg Panoramafreiheit gibt. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Ich habs befürchtet :( Ich schreibe gerade einen Artikel über den Künstler. Schade. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 16:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Duplicates

Could you please delete these useless duplicates of File:Abigail Campbell and family.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

• File:Abigail Campbell and family rtg1.jpg
• File:Abigail Campbell and family rtg2.jpg
• File:Abigail Campbell and family rtg3.jpg
• File:Abigail Campbell and family rtg4.jpg
• File:Abigail Campbell and family rtg5.jpg

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Images: Amy Everson & Michael Lovan

Hi,

I'm Michael Lovan. My wife is Amy Everson. We own the photos used on our respective Wikipedia pages. This is verifiable via our official sites, which have embedded the images used in the Wiki:

www.michaelovan.com www.amyeverson.com

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Cheers, Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelovan (talk • contribs)

Hi Michael,

oh, congratulations. :-)

The problem with the image of Amy is that on IMDB it is tagged as "Photo by Kip Fulbeck - © Kip Fulbeck". If the latter fact is true, then you need to be really sure that you have obtained the full rights from Mr. Fulbeck, which would allow you to release this image under the choosen CC license, which allows any kind of use of the image (apart from restrictions per personality rights, of course). In addition, the author-entry for this photo should have been "Kip Fulbeck", not your name. If you are sure about that, then please send a confirmation-email from your business-account to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which you confirm to have the required rights from the photographer. The same goes for your own image, provided it has been shot by a photographer and neither by you or by Amy. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Getty Images

Hello, I want to add some of these images at wiki common. First, would that be ok? If yes, what kind of license/permission info should I give while uploading them. Thanks--TripWire (talk) 07:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

as you may know, Getty Images is a commercial photo agency, which is also well-known for extensively suing those for copyright-infringement, who use their images without having paid them. So, in general you can forget material from Getty Images, as it is nearly always still copyrighted. What interest would they have to offer freely license images? When you click on one of the images on the above linked site, you get this information: overall it shows that you will have to pay and that there are additional restriction for commercial use. This alone is a no-go for Commons, as our policy COM:L requires all uploade to be free also for commercial use. The example-image is credited to "Popperfoto". So, it seems that is not original material from Getty. You may try to contact Popperfoto. However, it's not too likely that they will grant you a free license, when thye let market it by Getty for money. When asking, remember "for Wikipedia" is not enough and is not accepted on Commons. It needs to be free license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Getty is ofcourse a commercial photo agency, how could I have missed that?! Thanks for the clarification. i want ask another question, if I want to upload this image from a blog, would that be OK? --TripWire (talk) 08:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The same image is also credited to Getty here. Of course, that does not necessarily mean that a Getty-photographer has shot the image. It might simply mean that the original photographer sold this image to Getty or gave them a license. You need to perform a thorough research to find out who is the true photographer and eventually try to contact him. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

FoP-Spain

Hallo Túrelio, Du meinst es sicher gut, aber ist die Angabe von {{FoP-Spain}} für ein Steinmännchen und einen Leuchtturm nicht doch übertrieben? -- Ies (talk) 20:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Nun, da die Schutzfähigkeit bzw. Schöpfungshöhe von Land zu Land variiert, kann das ohnehin immer nur eine Peilung aus dem Bauchgefühl sein. Das Design dieses Leuchtturms finde ich total kreativ. Bei dem Steinmännchen war ich in der Tat unsicher, ob das ein Künstler oder irgendein Tourist gemacht hat. Da habe ich einfach mal per "Im Zweifel für den .." entschieden. Deshalb kannst du letzteres gerne rückgängig machen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:A.Shahinyan.jpg

Hallo Túrelio! Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit. In File:A.Shahinyan.jpg habe ich statt Herstellungsdatum das Upload-Datum verwendet und in File:1962, Материнство.jpg habe ich kein Datum eingetragen - beide sind korrigiert. Hoffe jetzt ist alles klar? Danke im Voraus --Safstep (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Safstep,

hast du das erstgenannte Foto von 1980 tatsächlich selbst (das Original) aufgenommen oder hast du ein vorhandenes Foto reproduziert?

Beim zweitgenannten Foto wüsste ich gerne, wo (Art des Ortes) das aufgenommen wurde, in einer Gallerie/Museum/Studio oder im öffentlichen Raum? --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, vor welchem Hintergrund stellst du die Frage? Beide Fotos wurden im Atelier von A. Shahinyan von mir aufgenommen, so dass sie in meinem Eigentum stehen. Die Fotos wurden anschließend von mir digitalisiert (2014). Zudem bin ich selbst Armenier, kannte Shahinyan persönlich und beschäftige mich seit über 50 Jahren mit der Fotografie -- --Safstep (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Die 1. Frage war nur eine unspezifische Frage aus der allgemeinen Erfahrung, da viele Hochlader eher jüngeren Alters (als du und ich) sind.

Die 2. Frage zielt darauf dass dieses Foto urheberrechtlich eine "Bearbeitung" (COM:DW) der abgebildeten Skulptur (geschützt bis 2074) darstellt. Damit ist das Urheberrecht des Schöpfers der Skulptur berührt. Wenn die Skulptur irgendwo im öffentlichen Raum gestanden hätte, dann wäre das Foto durch die Panoramafreiheit (Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Armenia) zulässig. Im anderen Fall ist eine Genehmigung des Bildhauers erforderlich. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Alles klar. Besten Dank. MfG --Safstep (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Kamehameha IV

Can you move the 03:25, 6 December 2004 and 16:19, 12 January 2009 uploads of File:Kamehameha IV, lithograph by Grozelier (cropped).jpg to File:KamehamehaIV.jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, I have no idea how to perform a version-move. Besides, what is your rationale for that? (as the images are different) --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

File:EselEttalerMuehle 1092.jpg

Hi, Túrelio, how come this image does not show on the File usage on other wikis ? Lotje (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, hmm. When I call this image page, I do see the section "Globale Dateiverwendung" with listed uses on :de, :en, :fr, :hr und :sh. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Page Elke Austenat deletion

Could you please inform me why you deleted the page Elke Austenat yesterday afternoon? As far as I could see, I tried to keep all necessary criteria of Wikipedia and even took another site as an example. Please reply so I know how to improve the page. Rgds Andrea Wrba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreawrba (talk • contribs)

Hallo Andrea,

die Seite Elke austenat, auf Commons technisch eigentlich eine Gallerie-Seite, enthielt einen kompletten Artikel über Elke Austenat. Der wäre möglicherweise auf der Wikipedia gut aufgehoben, nicht aber auf Commons, das eine Medien-Sammlung ist. Du hast diesen Artikel also einfach am falschen Ort angelegt. --Túrelio (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging 12 July 2015

Regarding your recent notifications, please note the cc-by-4.0 icon stating the license of the photo can be found at the bottom of the posted source, on the right, under the last photo before the comments. Thanks. --ChoHyeri (talk) 08:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You are right. They have effectively hidden that information. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Zulässig?

Meiner Meinung nach ist dieses Foto [17] in der de:WP nicht zulässig. Siehst Du das auch so? Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Hab einen LA gestellt. Kann natürlich sein, dass es in der unbekannten Quelle "Rappel" als PD bezeichnet wurde, das müsste aber belegt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Gestern erst habe ich selbst herausgefunden, was "Rappel" bedeutet. Das ist eine Sammlung von Dokumenten und Aufsätzen zum Zweiten Weltkrieg in Luxemburg, von einem Verband zusammengestellt: Revue Mensuelle de la L.P.P.D. : Organe de la Lique Luxembourgeoise des Prissonniers et Deportes Politikques. --Nicola (talk) 16:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright warnings on my talk page

Check the images sources. It shows as being properly licensed but I guess they were lying. Just go ahead and delete them if you are sure. I will be more careful next time. Please don't penalize me for this. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 08:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Similar to Commons, you cannot always be sure what people on Flickr are claiming. The difference is that here at Commons we patrol the uploads and thereby can filter out most copyvios. When you upload from Flickr, you should take a look at the other uploads of this user and about what he/she says about him/herself in the profile. If an image is "too good to come from this Flickr-user", then it may help to try to find earlier publication of the photo. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleting

Hello --Luisa (msg) 09:52, 19 lug 2015 (CEST)Hi, please to meet you. Can I know why did you delete the pictures I charged in commons? Thank you,

Luisa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Everydayblogs (talk • contribs)

Hi Luisa,

both images had been tagged for speedy-deletion due to suspicion of copyvio, as they had been found published elsewhere:

• File:Alessandro Ghebreigziabiher.jpg at http://www.rivieraoggi.it/2015/05/31/203969/gli-alunni-a-lezione-con-gheibreigziabhiher/
• File:Alessandro Ghebreigziabiher a teatro.jpg at http://www.romanzieracconti.it

--Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio, thank you for your answer and your time too. I think both websites took the pictures(https://www.flickr.com/photos/ildonodelladiversita/17409583650 and https://www.flickr.com/photos/ildonodelladiversita/17570812286/in/album-72157622102820361 from the original place, here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ildonodelladiversita/sets/72157622102820361 Before charging I asked the owner and she agreed, but maybe I should follow the same way I did with the first picture of the author, directly linking to flickr, what do you think? Thanks --Everydayblogs (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Luisa,

thanks for providing the true sources. However, it is sure now that you are not the photographer. If you upload someone else's work (even if under a free license), you cannot claim it as own work. As both images are under a Comons-compatible free license on Flickr, I recommend that you re-upload them (choose a slightly different file-name), using the upload-assistant and choosing the "from Flickr"-path from the beginning. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much. :) --Everydayblogs (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Spam

Hallo Túrelio, kannst Du bitte hier File:ORQUÍDEA ALEGRIA.pdf nachschauen. Ich glaube, es ist lediglich eine spam - Seite. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 17:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done; war offenbar auch eine copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke!! Orchi (talk) 19:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

hey

sorry im new here oky remove all the Pictures

thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrBleZ (talk • contribs)

Hi, done already. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Priestley flips the bird.jpg

Hi Túrelio, this photo is ok? Check right bottom corner! Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Fenerli1978, it's legally o.k. as the original painting is out of copyright. However, the problem is that it is a manipulated image and that re-users on other projects are misled in thinking this might be real. Actually, 4 pages on different projects used this image as representation of the depicted person. I have corrected that. Feel free to request the file for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Nboro first burial.jpg

Greetings - this file was deleted with the note "(Copyright violation: external source, no license, no permission.)". Perhaps I was mistaken in the copyright tag I used on the image, but it is owned by the Northborough Historical Society, which I am a member. I attempted to attribute it as an image I found online but HAVE permission to use, but apparently this wasn't done correctly. Can you please help me reinstate this file with the correct copyright? Thanks, Garchy (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

This is resolved, reuploaded with correct copyright tag to English Wikipedia. Thanks, Garchy (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Главнаѩ страніца

This page was a translation of the main page. Why did you delete it? Ilya Drakonov (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC).

Hi Ilya, because it was thought to be an erroneously created gallery. Do you want it to be restored? --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Bell Pits - Drawing

Hi, confirmation of permission to use this drawing, which you have deleted, was mailed to permissions@wikimedia.org on 5th August. Clivemacd (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Clivemacd,

is File:Bell Pits Drawing.jpg the file for which you sent a permission? --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Juliana Areias

You notified me about 2 images that you deleted, stating that the images do not match the uploader. This is because I am not the person in the image. They informed me that permission was sent to you in email to use these so please let me know what additional information you need to restore them. --Disssspit (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Seem to be ignoring messages here so took care of it myself. Went through the long process of uploading the images again. Permission was already sent under Ticket#2015080910001172. --Disssspit (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Disssspit, sorry that I couldn't reply earlier. Eventually you misunderstood the deletion summary. It was "Copyright holder in EXIF does not match uploader in any way". You stated that "Juliana Areias" is the author/photographer, but you, User:Disssspit, seem not to be Juliana Areias. So, we needed a permission from Juliana Areias. I've added an OTRS-pending tag to both uploads and asked at the OTRS-noticeboard for validation. My colleague Natuur12 is already working on it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Said_Baaghil_Profile_Picture.JPG is not a Copyrighted Image

Hi

I would like to use Said_Baaghil_Profile_Picture.JPG as it is not a copyrighted image and truly and fairly represents the person whose page is being created on wikipedia

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moiz muqri (talk • contribs)

Hi Moiz muqri,

the image File:Said Baaghil Profile Picture.JPG had been tagged for deletion as there is no evidence for the claimed PD-Saudi Arabia license, as the depicted person can't have been created before 1961. Also, material on Twitter is not free per se, i.e. without a permission from the author. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Seite sperren?

Hallo Túrelio! Könntest Du bitte diese Seite komplett sperren, also auch für mich? Wäre ungeschickt, wenn jemand eine Änderung dort vornimmt und ich es nicht mitbekomme. Dank Dir! hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 22:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi hilarmont, es ging dir nur um deine Benutzerseite, nicht die Benutzer-Disku, richtig? Erstere habe ich jetzt vollgeschützt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Thx for quick deleting...

... File:Most wanted holla(alberto jose).ogg. Background info (if not known yet): User:Teles/Mass copyvios + User talk:Teles#Mass copyvios. Could you please also indef block the related user Eunice Lopes (see also COM:AN/B#Angola Facebook case)? Gunnex (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Already  Done by Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Santa Maria in Valle Porclaneta

Thank you for Category:Santa Maria in Valle Porclaneta --Marica Massaro (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

In addition to speedies

If you have a moment could you take a look at the remaining uploads here. They got DR requested before I could speedy tag them (account should be locked on Meta soon). Thanks for all the work & best --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I've deleted some; the rest was speedied by Billinghurst. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete bad pictures

Hi, Túrelio,

I have put 4 bad pictures of Colchicum alpinum for "speedy delete". It is not really urgent, but when using the template "delete" for it, I could not succeed, because an error message.

Thank you for your appreciated help. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 15:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Réginald,

sorry, I came too late. However, for images which have been on Commons for such a long time, a regular DR is more appropriate. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

No problem. A regular DR is now requested for these pictures. Let us wait... Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 21:09, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

pic crystal singing bowl

	pic crystal singing bowl
	Sie haben unberechtigerweise mein Foto der weissen Kristallklangschale wieder hochgeladen. Entfernen Sie es sofort! Post vom Anwalt folgt DieKlangschale (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

@DieKlangschale: Wikipedia:No legal threats please. Lotje (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted redirect

Hi, I'm not sure why you deleted the redirect at COM:PERSONALITY, but it breaks a lot of links (both on and off the site). See Special:WhatLinksHere/Commons:PERSONALITY Could you please restore? -Pete F (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Are your sure? It had been deleted more than 7 months ago. In addition, the number of pages to which this page links, is rather limited. For now, I've temporarily restored the page. --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring. From my work on other wikis, I have always followed the concept that "redirects are cheap" -- that is, that there is little downside to having a redirect that might be useful even in a small number of instances. I did not notice that this was deleted in January, but it is something I have used frequently in the past, not just on Commons but in various emails and (I think) blog posts and writings about Wikimedia.

I see now that this occurred in the context of a deletion discussion about the page it redirects to, so I understand better why it happened. Still, I believe the issue of personality rights in general is important to Commons, not so different from things like licensing, Freedom of Panorama, de minimus, etc. It's a concept that comes up in discussion, and is reflected in at least one guideline. While the existing essay at Commons:Personality rights may be regarded as historical by those few in the deletion discussion, it seems worthwhile to me to put something there that is informative to anybody unfamiliar with the concept. I am happy to work on this, and happy to see that Lotje has similar ambitions; until we can do something more substantial, keeping the redirect there would be helpful. -Pete F (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

@User:Túrelio, sorry to "bump" into this conversation, but imo adding the {{Personality rights}} template to the Commons:Photographs of identifiable people might be useful, only I do not have a clue how to do this. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, no problem with this. However, I think I don't get what you are saying. The issue of Pete is just about the redirect COM:PERSONALITY. Whereas the template {{Personality rights}} is well functioning and I personally use it a lot of time to tag images of living persons. --Túrelio (talk) 12:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, the {{Personality rights}} template is functioning very well, but I thought, maybe, if we add the warning template at the top of the Commons:Photographs of identifiable people page it might be a helpful hint/reminder for those contributors who are not very familiar with this issue. Lotje (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lotje,

I don't object to include the template on that page. However, the page and the template have different aims&targets. The template is directed at re-users and aims to prevent a violation of personality rights when re-using the image. The linked page (COM:IDENT) targets uploaders (and reviewers) and provides guidance whether an image of a identifiable living persons can (or cannot) legitimately be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Lotje (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Zugeflogene Ente

Hallo Túrelio,
nachdem ich diese hübsche Ente File:A natural history of British birds (18962152323).jpg gedreht habe, ist zu zu meinen uploads [18] geflogen. Kannst Du sie dort bitte löschen? Dank und Gruß. Orchi (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,

aus der Upload-Liste direkt löschen geht m.W. nicht. Ich habe einfach selbst noch auf dieselbe Version "zurückgesetzt". Jetzt scheint sie aus deiner Uploadliste zu meiner geflogen zu sein. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

...jetzt schnattert sie wohl bei uns beiden. :-) Orchi (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Borrado con criterio erróneo

Hola Turelio, me parece que con buena intención pero que con un criterio erróneo eliminó la imagen "File:Monumento_Nacional_de_Costa_Rica_Detalle.JPG". con el argumento: (Copyright violation: No freedom of panorama in Costa Rica)). Debo acotar que esa escultura se hizo y terminó en Paris en 1891 por el escultor francés Louis-Robert Carrier-Belleuse que murió el 14 de junio de 1913, hace 102 años. Además está en un parque público donde este y la escultura son propiedad del Estado. O sea, por cualquier lado que se mire, no aplica ese criterio. Le agradeceré revierta el borrado de la imagen. Saludos --Arstempo (talk) 15:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

License

Hi there! Im confuse about this file: File:Engin Akyürek "bi küçük Eylül Meselesi" Premier 11.02.2014.jpg. Is the license correct? Connie^GB 21:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Provided that uploader Bbbilgin is indeed the photographer, the license-templates are legitimate. True, in the edit-summary of the second version of the image, he wrote "public domain". But, as he didn't change the original license-templates, we can safely ignore that. --Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Fanwen619 your uploads

Hi Fanwen619, what do you by writing in the source-entry of all your uploads "own work" and http://www.flowersview.com.... ? What is you relation to flowersview.com? Did you really shoot all these photos by yourself or did you just take them from flowersview.com? --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Túrelio. I own the web www.flowersview.com. All the photos I uploaded are shoot by myself. One editor(I am a fresh man using Wiki. I do not know how to find the message left by him,or I will show you the name) told me that I can write the link in the source-entry to help the other to find more information of the image. I am sorry to trouble you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanwen619 (talk • contribs)

I have confirmed that this user has control over the website so I'm satisfied.--Sphilbrick (talk) 01:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Bitte um Überprüfung

Hallo Túrelio, könntest Du bitte folgende Dateien zum copyright überprüfen:

• File:Arundina graminifolia (58) 1200.jpg
• File:Arundina graminifolia (72) 1200.jpg
• File:Arundina graminifolia (5) 1200.jpg

und weitere?? Danke und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done und Frage an Uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Требую вернуть файл File:Dj Camelia.jpg

Попрошу вас вернуть файл File:Dj Camelia.jpg , поскольку удалили его без весомых причин. Я имею право как угодно, и где угодно использвовать данный файл, разрешение получил от правообладателя,это первое. Второе: данный файл могут использвовать все, в том числе и коммерческих целях. Я полностью готов нести ответственность за данный файл.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Valeriya Snoub (talk • contribs)

Требую вернуть файл File:Расцвет Dj Camelia.jpg

Попрошу вас вернуть файл File:Dj Camelia.jpg , поскольку удалили его без весомых причин. Я имею право как угодно, и где угодно использвовать данный файл, разрешение получил от правообладателя,это первое. Второе: данный файл могут использвовать все, в том числе и коммерческих целях. Я полностью готов нести ответственность за данный файл.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Valeriya Snoub (talk • contribs)

Hi Valeriya,

I don't read Russian. From Google-translator I understand that you think your uploads were legitimate.

• The image File:Dj Camelia.jpg had no license-template and no evidence of a permission. Both is required.
• The image File:Расцвет Dj Camelia.jpg had no license-template and no evidence of a permission. Both is required.

Due to the language barrier, I would recommend you contact one of my Russian-speaking colleagues, such as User:George Chernilevsky, User:EugeneZelenko, User:Ymblanter or User:Butko. --Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Liberty Barnes picture

You rejected my picture of my wife, Liberty Barnes. The pic was taken by a photographer (Alex Sarbu), hired by me. How can we get that approved for upload?

Thanks, Levi

Fizixgeek (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

If Alex Sarbu was the photographer, then you should not claim to be the author by yourself, but write his name into the author-entry. If your hiring contract with the photographer expressedly includes the right to distribute this photo under a free license, then please send an email from your official email account to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which you should confirm your rightsholdership and your will to release the photo under the choosen free license (cc-by-3.0). Please include contact information. Your email will be processed by our OTRS-volunteers, but not made public. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Yul Edochie.jpg

Thank you for the attention you drew to the file I uploaded, I did not know it required a permission. Please you may delete the file to avoid breaking any copyright laws. I will upload the one I have full rights to.

Thank you DoctorNigeria (talk) 22:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done (talk page stalker) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Artemisia mutellina.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

User:Oceancetaceen has on 19 September 2015 on an unauthorised manner overwritten the picture, which was uploaded by User:Ghislain118 on 26 January 2011. I have reverted Ghislain's original picture and let Oceancetaceen that she may not do so, and that she has to re-upload her picture with another label.

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 07:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I've notified the user. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Cossery.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

I understand your reason to delete the file completely, but being new to Wikimedia, I don't get why the original file is on the english version of Wikipedia — thus escaping the "fair use" criteria which would cause its deletion – and not on Commons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Albert_Cossery.jpg

Could you please explain? I thought that all pictures had to be centralized on Commons.

Thank you very much in advance for your answer,

Kalashni (talk) 10:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kalashni,

en-Wikipedia has a local policy to allow low-resolution non-free images per the fair-use doctrine (a specialty in U.S. copyright law). However, "fair-use" is not applicable to Commons, neither per the law nor by our own policy. So, such images cannot be uploaded to Commons. However, as you did upload this image likely with the intend to use it on a Wikipedia, you should check whether your Wikipedia also has an exemption policy, such as :en's fair-use policy. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. I'd like to upload it to the french version of Wikipedia. Does it also have an exemption policy? All the best, Kalashni (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't know. You need them locally. --Túrelio (talk) 12:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you again, I will ask them. Last thing, so I understand it completely for the next time: where do you upload those low-resolution non-free images per the fair-use doctrine if it is not on Commons? I also have such images for en-Wikipedia. Kalashni (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Here you go: en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. There you will also find interwiki links to other languages. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Need help :)

File:St Antonius Church, Yogyakarta.jpg

100px

Hi, it's me again :) sorry for bothering. May you help me to delete this pic? I just upload a better pic. Thank you again :) Okkisafire (talk) 13:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

You called

Hi,

I uploaded the picture [Akshay at GQ], it is owned by Bollywood Hungama, I followed the protocol of other pictures uploaded on commons, from the said site, such as this, this and this among others.

Thanks.Barthateslisa (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

True. But when you compare both image-pages, you will immediately see the difference. The one, which I have tagged, is missing the OTRS-permission-tag and the specific bollywoodhungama-template. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Shk747

please stay calm ;.)

as i'm rather new here it's not so easy to know what to do. my the way what "copyright" this is MY tam (the green one) and the image was taken by myself.

if possible it would be nice to get mine "in front" as some changes are allways better than stay on stillstand ;-)

best, sascha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shk747 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 07 October 2015 (UTC)

Es wäre wohl besser, wenn du auf deutsch schreibst. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Überschreiben von existierenden Dateien geht garnicht. Das hast du mehrfach getan, teils sogar wiederholt. Das kann schnell zu einer Sperre führen; also lass es.

2 deiner Autofotos wurden vor dem Upload hier auf Flickr hochgeladen und sind dort "(C) Alle Rechte vorbehalten". Das legt nahe, dass du sie von dort einfach kopiert hast. Wenn es sich dabei aber um dein eigenes Flickr-Konto handelt, dann sende eine Mail von diesem Flickr-Konto an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, in der du bestätigen solltest, dass du die beiden auf Commons hochgeladenen Bilder der gewählten freien Lizenz unterstellst. Die Bilder sollten dabei angegeben werden (Flickr- und Commons-URL). --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

p.s. nachdem du ja aus deutschland bist folgendes:

hier kannst du alle MEINE relevanten tamora photos sehen ;-)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/shk777/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shk747 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 07 October 2015 (UTC)

O.k., dann tu das, was ich dir oben empfohlen habe. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Pictures of mine

Sorry about that. Kindly delete File:Jay Durias of South Border.jpg File:Davao City Torotot Festival gathering.jpg File:Abreeza Mall Facade.jpg File:GMall Davao Logo.jpg File:Davao Light logo.jpg that violates the copyright that i uploaded yesterday. Thank you for reminding me about that. GertrudeCarmelite (talk) 09:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Error deleting my picture

Hi! I think you mistakenly erased one picture I took. This one is different from the one you are marking as "original", and either way, both of those are mine. It's my wife, I was on the red carpet and the picture was taken with my cellphone, so this is obviously a problem. Would you help me? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.56.39.26 (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

I have no idea of which image you talking about, as you are not logged-in. I need to know the file name or you user name. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo

Ich habe vor einige zeit neue Kategorien gemacht ([19], [20], [21] uvm), aber die Benutzerin Алиса Селезньова tut ganze zeit die Bilder von der Kategorie weg, und versuch Sie die Kategorien zu löschen (jetzt sind schon von dir gelöscht). Kann jemand von der Admins reagieren und fragen wo das Problem liegt? Es geht um Bilder von Personen, die ich denke das die verdienen Kategorien zu haben. Danke--Rašo 09:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Rasho, may be you could ask me? These categories were with wrong names and had only one picture in them. Considering the objects of the categories it is very highly unlikely many pictures to appear there.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Raso,

ich schreibe mal auf englisch, damit es beide verstehen (du auch, ja?).

With such small disagreements its always good to directly contact the other user who seems to have a different opinion - also to avoid simple misunderstandings and unnecessary tensions.

1) "wrong names" of category: with categories for specific persons, a problem may arise when the name of that person is written differently in his native language/country and in other languages. In doubt, I would prefer the name that is more often used, as this will be the one, users may search for. However, in such cases, the other versions of the name should then be written into the description of the category, so that our search-engine can find them too. As an example, see the header of Carolus Magnus, where you find his name in different languages.

2) "only one picture" in the category: while it is correct that we often delete a category which has only one entry, this is not an absolute rule. It depends on the circumstances. IMO, a one-item-only-category could be o.k. for the moment, if more images are to be expected or if all other categories are way too unspecific.

--Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

OK. First of all, the names are NOT whrong. It's about a categories of Macedonian people, made by macedonian (me, who knows macedonian) and was disclaimed by bulgarians who nothing to do else but messing in macedonian stuff. Sorry Алиса, but if you so worry about the one-picture category then u should look in those bulgarian category such: Category:Maria Kirkova, Category:Christo Proykov and a tens with one or two pics. In my case like Category:Nikola Maleshevski ist about lot of pics. But is obvious that the problem is Macedonian language, who u bulgarians denies. Sorry Túrelio, aber bin ich nicht seit gestern hier. Seit 2008, habe ich über 45000 beiträge mit über 30.000 Bilder hochgeladen nur von mir. Regards

Ich habe nicht gesagt, dass die Namen falsch sind, sondern auf Basis der Argumente von Алиса versucht, euch praktische Kriterien zur Lösung dieses Konflikts an die Hand zu geben. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Du nicht, aber die schon. Nach meine Meinung, am besten und kurzfristig ist das die Leute geboren und gestorben in Mazedonien - mazedonische Rechtschreibung nutzen. Und für die anderen, mussen wir ein Kompromiss finden.--Rašo 12:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Rasho but I am also from Macedonia and those people lived and died in the Ottoman empire and have nothing to do with RM - this of course is not for this talk page. My point is that there is only one picture for each of these men and is very unlikely even a second picture to appear. There is no point in creating a category for a single picture in the case when more pictures are very unlikely to appear.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

No Alisa, sorry u, but u are not from Macedonia, u are from Bulgaria. Those people are born, rised and died in Macedonia, for Macedonia and for its Independende. Like i say, here are Category:Maria Kirkova, Category:Christo Proykov ect,; well u are wellcomme to nominate this categories for deletion.--Rašo 14:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Frances O'Connor Eating.jpg

Hello, this picture is a work derived from the 1932 movie, Freaks, which is in the public domain since 2011

Yasméssica (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pierre Puvis.JPG

What is the matter ? I don't understand the real and mean problem. Friendly. --Claude PIARD (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I only know what was written in the original speedy-deletion request. If I understand it correctly, the nominator suspects that the image is not an original photography, but that it might be a reproduction of an existing printed image, such as if you go into an exhibition and shoot a digital photo from a printed photo/painting/whatever on the wall. One clue seems to be that the depicted person in your image looks younger that in the linked external image, though both are said to be from the same your (2013). So, if your image is indeed a reproduction, as your 10:03-reply suggests, the most important question is, who has shot the original image? If it was you, you only need to provide the approximate year of creation of the original photo. If it was not you, then you need to provide a permission from the original photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Mon anglais étant detestable, je vais d'abord m'exprimer en français. Je suis bien l'auteur de cette photo mais je ne puis en fixer la date avec certitude. Compte tenu de la remarque justifiée de la partie adverse j'ai d'abord pensé au scan d'une photo argentique. Mais il peut s'agir aussi d'une photo plus récente comme semble l'indiquer son authentification où le sujet serait rajeuni par l'effet flash. Ce niveau d'enquête étant assez rare, j'espère qu'il n'est pas lié à ça ?

I am the author of this photo. When ? I can not answer certainly. But these kind of question being very few I hope their is non bound with this ? Friendly--Claude PIARD (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

O.k. If you still have the photo-print (from which you took the digital image), look at the backside. If it was created in a commercial laboratory, there may be a date-stamp. If not, try to narrow down the likely year of creation of the original photo, like "before 2013", "before 2000", "between 2000 and 2010". This would be welcome, though not necessary for the deletion discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

It is not a commercial photo but a true amator photo, with very bad definition. I have only the file in my PC ; I think the date (2013) is good and P. Puvis looks younger that in the linked external image because flash. Sorry.--Claude PIARD (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I didn't say "commercial photo". When you shoot photos on an analogue color film, you usually give it to a laboratory to develop it and get prints. Didn't you do that? So, the print is produced by a commercial laboratory. And they usually put a date stamp on the backside of the print. Though this date is not the photo-date, but the print-date, it is helpful to determine when the photo had been shot. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

OTRS?

Hi Lev. Anthony, per your statement here and here, are you an OTRS volunteer or did the "owner" contact you directly? --Túrelio (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
Le Transbordeur is my second account (if you click on the link, you’ll arrive on the user page of my principal account, Lev. Anthony). I’m not an OTRS volunteer (my request wasn’t accepted), but Ian Vickery, the photograph, had sent me a mail where he said: « Whilst I am happy for you to use my photo, I do not accept the terms. » after i asked him if he could send a mail to the OTRS. It’s why i’ve requested the deletions of the photos, but i’d forgot to unlogged from Lev. Anthony and to connect under Le Transbordeur. I’ll be more careful next time.
Good day. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

O.k., thanks. Files deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you.
Good day. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Coronel Fabriciano, Minas Gerais, Brasil1.jpg

Hi. The image is not in use in any wiki and not well represents the location. This is complete and can replace the old one. --HVL talk 21:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I had written "external uses". --Túrelio (talk) 06:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Frage

Hallo Túrelio, könntest Du bitte hier: [22] einmal nachschauen. User:RaboKarbakian ist wohl neu hier, macht aber nach meiner Meinung mit dem Aufarbeiten und Verbessern von Bildern aus alten Büchern sehr gute Arbeit für Commons. Vielleicht kann man einen Weg finden, ihn nicht zu Beginn seiner Tätigkeit hier mit Vorschriften zu vergraulen ;-). Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Cam Dolan

What's up? We don't delete copvios anymore? Aʀvєδuι ⁺ 20:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Didn't you read my edit-summary? How can a page from 2015 be the source for an image which was uploaded in 2014? This image might still be a copyvio, but you provided no evidence for that. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I just got an alert that you reverted my edit. And responding on your own talkpage without {{Ping}} is one of the - let's be polite - less advised moves at Wiki. Regards, Aʀvєδuι ⁺ 17:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Obviously you have no reply to my factual arguments, so you need to resort to personal attacks. Sad. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Ilija Fonlamov Franciskovic

The photo I uploaded is my work, and I am the owner, how I can upgrade licence, so the photo will not be deleted? Ilija Fonlamov Francisković.jpg --Djolecarkralj (talk) 13:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Djolecarkralj,

I do not doubt that the photo of the magazine covers is yours. However, who has originally shot the photo on the magazine cover? You need his/her permission. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

RE: Stop

Sorry! --Belllissimo (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

ACK. --Túrelio (talk) 06:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

DR

Hello,

Can you please look into the following DR, please:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_of_User:Ravi_kolkata

Thanks in advance. --Muzammil (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done by Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 11:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Danke

fürs Rotieren :) --Nicola (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, ich habe rund 400 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen zahlreiche seit Tagen nicht gedreht wurden [23]. Kannst Du mir da in irgendeiner Weise helfen? Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Ich dachte zuerst, es nur eine der WMF-üblichen Verzögerungen wegen overload. Aber nein, es sieht momentan schlecht aus, siehe: User:SteinsplitterBot/Rotatebot. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Also gibt es keine andere Möglichkeit? Mist, 100 Bilder von mir stehen in der Schlange :( --Nicola (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Hat sich bis auf wenige Fotos jetzt doch erledigt :) --Nicola (talk) 07:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Questionable uploads

Hey Túrelio, I really hope you don't mind me approaching you, it's just that I know you are one of the most competent admins here on Commons. I have a question, and didn't know where better to ask, regarding the uploads of Magdalenakamieniarczyk (talk · contribs). They are, as far as I can see, all of a personal matter. Rather than nominate each and every one for deletion, is there any way of cleaning this up quicker? What is the procedure here? Is there anything I should or could have done sooner? Jared Preston (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jared,

if many file of 1 user have the same rationale for deletion, one can put them into 1 DR. When I do this manually, I start the regular DR process with one 1 file. Then I copy the DR-template from that file and paste it onto the pages of all the other files and paste the filenames of all these files into the DR-page. An instruction is here Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. Admins can also use Special:Nuke, which is reserved for special cases, which don't require any further discussion. In the above case, I would suggest the first procedure, as there are only 13 files. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd have nuked them for that reason, but anyway, now I've started a mass deletion request. That took a while! There must be an easier way, but I guess there's a script for that. In the meantime, I've also voted in one of your requests for deletion. How large is the backlog here? Jared Preston (talk) 16:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Diese Person lädt bis zum heutigen Tage immer noch solche Fotos hoch. Kannst du doch nichts machen, Túrelio? Jared Preston (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Hat sich inzwischen erledigt, da nur noch 2 Dateien vorhanden und eine unter LA. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ich brauche eine zweite Meinung

Hallo Túrelio. Ich habe gerade eine Massenlöschung für die Uploads von Sialkotregalia (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads) block user durchgeführt , weil alle diese Bilder die Email-Addresse der Firma enthalten. Dann erst habe ich gesehen, dass es eine Löschdiskussion gibt: Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Sialkotregalia. Ich finde, diese Fotos sind zur schnellen Löschung geeignet (speedy deletion), weil sie nicht im Interesse des Commons-Projekts sind, aber ich frage mich, ob ich sie für die Diskussion wieder herstellen soll. Was hältst Du davon?

Die gleiche Frage habe ich auch Poco a Poco gestellt, aber der ist offenbar schon wieder offline. Bevor ich diese ca. 100 Dateien einzeln wieder zurückhole, wäre es daher schön, eine zweite Meinung zu hören. De728631 (talk) 19:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi De728631,

ich habe mir aus jeder der "Serien" in der DR je 1 gelöschtes Bild angeschaut und stimme mit dir überein, dass keines davon etwas auf Commons zu suchen hat. Andererseits ist es, außer bei klaren Copyvios, nicht so ideal bei einer gerade gestarteten DR alles schnellzulöschen. Ich würde an deiner Stelle einfach in die DR-Diskussion eine Notiz setzen, dass du einige Serien der nominierten Bilder schnellgelöscht hast, weil du die LD nicht bemerkt hast (oder waren die Dateien sowie nicht mit einem DR-Hinweis versehen?), und bereit bist, auf Wunsch die gelöschten Dateien vorübergehend wiederherzustellen. Vermutlich wird keiner danach fragen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, das hört sich gut an. Die Kriterien zur Schnelllöschung erlauben zwar das Übergehen einer LD, aber ich finde deinen Vorschlag besser. De728631 (talk) 20:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

"Wild Bunch Germany" account block needed

Hi Túrelio,
please lock a "Wild Bunch Germany" account due to multiple copyright violations (uploading to Wikimedia Commons non-free film posters).

Thank you,
Adrianwo 14:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done already by Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

page deletion

Hi Túrelio, i noticed you deleted my user page, sorry I did not know that i cant have one, i though everyone must somehow identify himself. so the user pages are only for administrators or my user name was not good? please advise, i am new to wiki - best regards, tim, studio_tws nov 06 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studio TWS (talk • contribs) 13:04, 06 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Studio TWS,

sorry for my late answer. You userpage had been deleted with the rationale "out of COM:SCOPE". Its content looked a bit too promotional. Also, you should not put your userpage into the category-system for media files. --Túrelio (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nikos Κarabelas 2007.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for pointing out that permission was missing. This is my own work and I grant permission under terms of Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 for my work to be used. I hope this clarifies the matter and you could make the necessary ammendments to the file.

Muchas Gracias Nikos D. Karabelas Actia Nicopolis (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Nikos,

I've removed the no-permission tag (and added a personality-tag, which is not a problem-tag, but a protection-tag). --Túrelio (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Túrelio Actia Nicopolis (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)